{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-5719",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-5719",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Legacy Blockchain Governance During Emerging Geopolitical Conflicts 95F6C25Bbb",
 "text": "Blockchain Governance During Emerging Geopolitical Conflicts should be assessed against Kaal's source-bound position that Conflict of laws rules should instead be used as a vehicle for implementing innovative national legal systems that utilize decentralized governance models and respect the autonomy of blockchain. The external source's verified abstract presents this proposition: Drawing on information systems, economics, and management, it identifies three interrelated forces shaping governance: technological design, institutional legitimation, and global conflict. The defensible response is a qualification: the source is pertinent to the Kaal position, but agreement, extension, contradiction, and scope should not be strengthened beyond the retrieved evidence.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "decentralization",
  "governance-design",
  "law-and-legal-systems",
  "blockchain",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response remains limited to the source proposition and evidence retrieved in this reconciliation cycle.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: legacy curated mapping review.",
  "Mapping confidence is intentionally unscored.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Blockchain Governance During Emerging Geopolitical Conflicts",
  "url": "https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2026/blockfintech/blockfintech/2/"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:5554218-014",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5554218-014",
  "citation": "Furrer Andreas, Wulf A. Kaal, Universal Digital Law Codex (UDLC) Building the Legal Infrastructure for the Digital Era (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5554218",
  "paper": "Furrer Andreas, Wulf A. Kaal, Universal Digital Law Codex (UDLC) Building the Legal Infrastructure for the Digital Era",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2025",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=5554218",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "55738b4035a91b70aa2ddaa127552fe4b373ec641afee2719fbdcabebdcbea44"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5554218-014"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Blockchain Governance During Emerging Geopolitical Conflicts",
   "url": "https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2026/blockfintech/blockfintech/2/"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:legacy-reconciliation-0001",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#frozen-batch-heading",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-5719",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-5719.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:5883851f827cd30be7ae",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "legacy curated mapping review",
 "mappingConfidence": null,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "legacy corpus-wide candidate binding",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source proposition is pertinent to the scope of kaal:claim:5554218-014; final semantic strength requires human review.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "aisel.aisnet.org",
  "endpoint": "https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2026/blockfintech/blockfintech/2",
  "status": 200,
  "contentType": "text/html; charset=UTF-8",
  "legacyEvidenceLevel": "abstract reviewed",
  "sourceLayer": "scholarly work",
  "provider": "aisel.aisnet.org",
  "providerId": "https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2026/blockfintech/blockfintech/2",
  "sourceIdentityKey": "url:https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2026/blockfintech/blockfintech/2",
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T17:48:22.774Z",
  "sourceMetadataSha256": "23e5577a048e0e6ac670811822e5f8dd38d17e7c37dd85cc98f4b9ac1054a764",
  "sourceContentSha256": "48b2540336ec59a65c540e79be635ab9ef17cb5d924a2ef122d25638db087c0f",
  "sourceProposition": "Drawing on information systems, economics, and management, it identifies three interrelated forces shaping governance: technological design, institutional legitimation, and global conflict."
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:legacy-reconciliation-0001, SHA-256 1f3dcd62332f12880cc3432ab8f2df0ba0b52bbf3db528ab15bff9b620296e35, as written and authorize publication of all 52 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "1b301dfa0fe9b66ef24fba5394e041e717ba905693835dae9dcfc2d8b394b1a6"
}