{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-5866",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-5866",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Ubi Dao Ibi Ius 23Aabbec57",
 "text": "UBI DAO IBI IUS? presents the following source proposition: Similarly, the digital revolution gave rise to Lex Informatica, in which IT protocols operate as regulatory mechanisms beyond traditional legislative control. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Open legal questions about the DAO, including which regime governs token issuance, minority token holder protection, taxation, the binding force of DAO smart contracts, ownership of intellectual property, and conflict resolution, must be answered before future DAO structures can operate seamlessly. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "dao",
  "law-and-legal-systems",
  "securities-law",
  "governance-design",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "openalex"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.4533.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "UBI DAO IBI IUS?",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-03273-7_9"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:2939127-032",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2939127-032",
  "citation": "Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in the Blockchain Revolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2939127",
  "paper": "Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in the Blockchain Revolution",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2017",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=2939127",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "abcef529c7200261c59eec43018375b3b26e3186239fb9d002bacc298dba26ff"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2939127-032"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "UBI DAO IBI IUS?",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-03273-7_9"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0002",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-5866",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-5866.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:c49b504c2ff108686188",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.4533,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: dao, revolution, operate, legal, law, intellectual, property, taxation. Scope: future decentralized autonomous organization setups.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "openalex",
  "sourceRecordId": "https://openalex.org/W4415679059",
  "queryId": "concept:d5ac73026e57",
  "queryText": "DAO governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-03273-7_9",
  "doi": "10.1007/978-3-032-03273-7_9",
  "externalIds": {
   "OpenAlex": "https://openalex.org/W4415679059",
   "DOI": "10.1007/978-3-032-03273-7_9"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T17:52:03.617Z",
  "providerPage": 3,
  "rawObservationSha256": "098ca477f71a725588e57f7ffeacbe71ac6eeab543977dd5444934cb429b8fe4",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "bdb2cd83e925a3abd26bab9a4375d1355c1d8fbab8736869dc7845f3ba159924",
  "inputLine": 7293,
  "chunkId": "openalex-00030",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.1007/978-3-032-03273-7_9",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Daniele Majorana"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2025-10-30",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.1007/978-3-032-03273-7_9",
   "openalex:https://openalex.org/w4415679059",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-03273-7_9",
   "title:d017db1626254d73cc0b01e7",
   "proposition:f102b84e6b86dce1256e16cd534641c6343eafe36ccf2e72bc71c28d8fba890b"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Similarly, the digital revolution gave rise to Lex Informatica, in which IT protocols operate as regulatory mechanisms beyond traditional legislative control.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "ccca4d0125715bc8573488582789092a5494568c200581270c5fe3630f8ddcce",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 1,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2939127-032",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2939127-032",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.4533,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: dao, revolution, operate, legal, law, intellectual, property, taxation. Scope: future decentralized autonomous organization setups.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3373393-029",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3373393-029",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3227,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: dao, mechanisms, control, legal, law, corporate, blockchain. Scope: the first DAO, launched May 2016 on Ethereum.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3373393-035",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3373393-035",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3137,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: dao, regulatory, traditional, value, legal, corporate, blockchain. Scope: DAO structures with few or no supervisors.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3652481-024",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3652481-024",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.309,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: dao, control, legislature, legal, law. Scope: jurisdictions with a consumer protection mandate.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3411110-027",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3411110-027",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3041,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: dao, regulatory, law, blockchain, technology, applications. Scope: SEC action between 2015 and the time of writing.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0002, SHA-256 86e0dda588610d89ed45ad08f4697601b5577f6e761e0bd9a9aef701c9c9deee, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "c15096ad711076f90543f5098a2d390c2ce1c6a8b4bd1a9e23157290251c8de3"
}