{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-5888",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-5888",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Experiments In Algorithmic Governance 8B5F494381",
 "text": "Experiments in algorithmic governance presents the following source proposition: It details the governance structures that were promised by the developers and community members involved in the making of The decentralised autonomous organisation (DAO), and in contrast, those that were observed in its discourses before, during, and after the “exploit.” The DAO was a decentralized, crowdfunded, direct-management organization and investment platform. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that A decentralized autonomous organization is merely computer code with no directors, managers or employees, its governance structure built with software, code and smart contracts running on a public decentralized blockchain platform. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "dao",
  "smart-contracts",
  "blockchain",
  "governance-design",
  "corporate-governance",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "openalex"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.3575.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Experiments in algorithmic governance",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315211909-8"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:3227967-023",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227967-023",
  "citation": "Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in a Digital Age Why 'Coding for Lawyers' Matters (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227967",
  "paper": "Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in a Digital Age Why 'Coding for Lawyers' Matters",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2018",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227967",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "f6e13b956f864ab32ec3305d095a35a127770327d75b3688f785cefc437d369f"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227967-023"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Experiments in algorithmic governance",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315211909-8"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0002",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-5888",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-5888.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:00e18403e1cede60111c",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.3575,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, autonomous, dao, decentralized, organization, platform, corporate, computer. Scope: DAOs built on public platforms, in most cases Ethereum.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "openalex",
  "sourceRecordId": "https://openalex.org/W2907986389",
  "queryId": "concept:ee778ad15ea3",
  "queryText": "decentralized autonomous organization",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315211909-8",
  "doi": "10.4324/9781315211909-8",
  "externalIds": {
   "OpenAlex": "https://openalex.org/W2907986389",
   "DOI": "10.4324/9781315211909-8",
   "MAG": "2907986389"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T17:52:04.824Z",
  "providerPage": 1,
  "rawObservationSha256": "6aa6d99e219f519bbf06d0b998e1e16374f3e722bcd39eede9dd33136c947ebb",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "bdb2cd83e925a3abd26bab9a4375d1355c1d8fbab8736869dc7845f3ba159924",
  "inputLine": 7467,
  "chunkId": "openalex-00030",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.4324/9781315211909-8",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Quinn DuPont"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2017-11-28",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.4324/9781315211909-8",
   "openalex:https://openalex.org/w2907986389",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315211909-8",
   "title:e34c7f457cc4a104f8eac1e2",
   "proposition:816f4090217d12c3047f86dc14f14d9abf1a0f14fa291a05bf24c7c3e1c6df59"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "It details the governance structures that were promised by the developers and community members involved in the making of The decentralised autonomous organisation (DAO), and in contrast, those that were observed in its discourses before, during, and after the “exploit.” The DAO was a decentralized, crowdfunded, direct-management organization and investment platform.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "84b6f19d1efb38a1b25ed234359816704c102efee95ef8c1247cf5204f9ddd24",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 0,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3227967-023",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227967-023",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.3575,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, autonomous, dao, decentralized, organization, platform, corporate, computer. Scope: DAOs built on public platforms, in most cases Ethereum.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3652481-011",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3652481-011",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3024,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, structures, developers, autonomous, dao, decentralized, organization. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3441904-046",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3441904-046",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.2931,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, structures, members, dao, contrast, corporate, blockchain. Scope: ideal typical DAO governance design parameters.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2922176-036",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2922176-036",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.2919,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, autonomous, dao, decentralized, organization, corporate, blockchain. Scope: the original DAO structure, running on the Ethereum public blockchain.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3227933-035",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227933-035",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.2919,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, autonomous, dao, decentralized, organization, corporate, blockchain. Scope: the DAO, 2016.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0002, SHA-256 86e0dda588610d89ed45ad08f4697601b5577f6e761e0bd9a9aef701c9c9deee, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "8d037076618515edf222d4603d00d404fde0a5a0803fbe7f0914e88400af3e03"
}