kaal:position:2026-07-31-5948

Is there a need for regulation of DAOs in Switzerland? presents the following source proposition: Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs), as open, scalable, and self-organized networks, do not easily fit into the available corporate legal forms in Swiss law. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that A decentralized autonomous organization is merely computer code with no directors, managers or employees, its governance structure built with software, code and smart contracts running on a public decentralized blockchain platform. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.

• The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
• External evidence level: abstract indexed.
• Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.
• Primary mapping confidence: 0.3744.
• The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation.

Is there a need for regulation of DAOs in Switzerland?

kaal:claim:3227967-023
Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in a Digital Age Why 'Coding for Lawyers' Matters (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227967
Source PDF sha256: f6e13b956f864ab32ec3305d095a35a127770327d75b3688f785cefc437d369f

Evidence: abstract indexed
Review tier: moderate-confidence claim review
Mapping confidence: 0.3744
Mapping ambiguous: true

daosmart-contractsblockchaingovernance-designcorporate-governancehistorical-responsescholarly-literatureopenalex

Affirmed in kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0002 on 2026-07-31. Review record.

Canonical markdown sha256: 6cd36c9337656fbd55db89ded8c1cede9d165feb0c57220bc5c980e160806a3e
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-5948.md | sha256sum