{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6044",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-6044",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Validation And Verification Of Smart Contracts A Research Agenda 06A42Bce29",
 "text": "Validation and Verification of Smart Contracts: A Research Agenda presents the following source proposition: Smart contracts might encode legal contracts written in natural language to represent the contracting parties' shared understandings and intentions. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that A smart contract is computer program code that enables the verification, execution and enforcement of specific terms and conditions of a contractual arrangement. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "smart-contracts",
  "blockchain",
  "law-and-legal-systems",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "openalex"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.3671.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Validation and Verification of Smart Contracts: A Research Agenda",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.1109/mc.2017.3571045"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:3227967-021",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227967-021",
  "citation": "Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in a Digital Age Why 'Coding for Lawyers' Matters (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227967",
  "paper": "Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in a Digital Age Why 'Coding for Lawyers' Matters",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2018",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227967",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "f6e13b956f864ab32ec3305d095a35a127770327d75b3688f785cefc437d369f"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227967-021"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Validation and Verification of Smart Contracts: A Research Agenda",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.1109/mc.2017.3571045"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0003",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6044",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6044.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:2575dc5981fdb08103fc",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.3671,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: verification, smart, contracts, legal, computer, contract, blockchain, digital. Scope: review source claim scope.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "openalex",
  "sourceRecordId": "https://openalex.org/W2758225150",
  "queryId": "concept:ee778ad15ea3",
  "queryText": "decentralized autonomous organization",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1109/mc.2017.3571045",
  "doi": "10.1109/mc.2017.3571045",
  "externalIds": {
   "OpenAlex": "https://openalex.org/W2758225150",
   "DOI": "10.1109/mc.2017.3571045",
   "MAG": "2758225150"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T17:52:08.785Z",
  "providerPage": 6,
  "rawObservationSha256": "0179769dc13148385485cf06380acfe30dfbd03e88fc598c57aa228df1043ede",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "bdb2cd83e925a3abd26bab9a4375d1355c1d8fbab8736869dc7845f3ba159924",
  "inputLine": 8498,
  "chunkId": "openalex-00002",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.1109/mc.2017.3571045",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Daniele Magazzeni",
   "Peter McBurney",
   "William L. Nash"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2017-01-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.1109/mc.2017.3571045",
   "openalex:https://openalex.org/w2758225150",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.1109/mc.2017.3571045",
   "title:9d2fa23c8d59adcc88728c3a",
   "proposition:e35f1ee881d20257ae1760e1c4f4097408252210538b168f1c091bc3e9222acb"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Smart contracts might encode legal contracts written in natural language to represent the contracting parties' shared understandings and intentions.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "6639a94b685e3c35229ccc2c5d6f147fbd1c66aec196d86f5b87fea693c19bc8",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 0,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3227967-021",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227967-021",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.3671,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: verification, smart, contracts, legal, computer, contract, blockchain, digital. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3405401-010",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3405401-010",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3618,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: verification, smart, contracts, natural, language, contracting, contract. Scope: interpretation of party intent is required.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3406323-032",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3406323-032",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3556,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: smart, contracts, natural, language, contracting, contract, business. Scope: human business interactions requiring interpretation of intent.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2959730-022",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2959730-022",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.3543,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: smart, contracts, legal, contracting, contract, blockchain, technology, applications. Scope: contract terms whose logic can be expressed in computer code.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3227967-023",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227967-023",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3452,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: smart, contracts, legal, computer, software, blockchain, digital. Scope: DAOs built on public platforms, in most cases Ethereum.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0003, SHA-256 8afd77518bf3e6dff3e21ea20524a254cd29e7e4678a80362a24c26c8dc039e2, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "c3a0088ad19d2a046251b75aab5109ec2269e0a31ad2cb82986c6c1dfb781d50"
}