{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6082",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-6082",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Do Smart Contracts Need New Conflict Of Laws Rules 80F49540E6",
 "text": "Do Smart Contracts Need New Conflict-of-Laws Rules? presents the following source proposition: Is it then possible to determine the law applicable to smart contracts? This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Uniform Law Commission style registration of virtual currency businesses may give courts more information about registered businesses, but jurisdiction over the parties to a smart contract remains largely elusive because smart contracting is distributed and global. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "law-and-legal-systems",
  "smart-contracts",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "openalex"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.4294.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Do Smart Contracts Need New Conflict-of-Laws Rules?",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004514850_019"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:2992962-011",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-011",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2017",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-011"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Do Smart Contracts Need New Conflict-of-Laws Rules?",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004514850_019"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0003",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6082",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6082.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:cb4a278e32f276633da6",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.4294,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: smart, contracts, laws, law, transaction, contract, jurisdiction, dispute. Scope: the draft Uniform Regulation of Virtual Currency Business Act as released in July 2017.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "openalex",
  "sourceRecordId": "https://openalex.org/W4388662108",
  "queryId": "concept:ee778ad15ea3",
  "queryText": "decentralized autonomous organization",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004514850_019",
  "doi": "10.1163/9789004514850_019",
  "externalIds": {
   "OpenAlex": "https://openalex.org/W4388662108",
   "DOI": "10.1163/9789004514850_019"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T17:52:11.122Z",
  "providerPage": 9,
  "rawObservationSha256": "77669bc2d7e29a118eeb6e9fb5de5fe634757512ce6d8bf207402dbb2a8e83bf",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "bdb2cd83e925a3abd26bab9a4375d1355c1d8fbab8736869dc7845f3ba159924",
  "inputLine": 9065,
  "chunkId": "openalex-00004",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.1163/9789004514850_019",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Mehdi El Harrak"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2023-11-07",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.1163/9789004514850_019",
   "openalex:https://openalex.org/w4388662108",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004514850_019",
   "title:5bcae0fd2eb66cb2185e0b41",
   "proposition:5aab05c9aa4f8e6d2ad288369cf314dd41933a31490de681aad38df05c03df5e"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Is it then possible to determine the law applicable to smart contracts?",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "3ed3a0fbab2f70831210c1d510ad89ff21b656b2824eda50929db3dd1c109a25",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 2,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2992962-011",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-011",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.4294,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: smart, contracts, laws, law, transaction, contract, jurisdiction, dispute. Scope: the draft Uniform Regulation of Virtual Currency Business Act as released in July 2017.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2992962-013",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-013",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.4221,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: smart, contracts, law, transaction, business, contract, jurisdiction, dispute. Scope: smart contracts where parties are anonymized by public-key encryption and VPNs.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2992962-003",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-003",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.422,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: smart, contracts, new, conflict, law, transaction, economics, dispute. Scope: Ethereum blockchain based smart contracting.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2992962-017",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-017",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.4099,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: smart, contracts, law, transaction, computer, contract, dispute, resolution. Scope: contract interpretation disputes over coded smart contracts.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2992962-018",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-018",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3947,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: smart, contracts, law, transaction, order, contract, dispute, resolution. Scope: transactions already executed and added to an immutable blockchain.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0003, SHA-256 8afd77518bf3e6dff3e21ea20524a254cd29e7e4678a80362a24c26c8dc039e2, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "14cd4d8535a069877676406a92c7b59887a9900ae696a92f3c500c956993451b"
}