{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6101",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-6101",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Dao Legal Forms Around The World D0B9B098Ac",
 "text": "DAO Legal Forms Around the World presents the following source proposition: The DAO Model Law created a well-founded basis for the legal structure of DAO companies based on functional and legal equivalence. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that If DAO members do not formalize a structure for their human created entity, courts are very likely to impose one on them, which is a serious risk of DAO membership. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "law-and-legal-systems",
  "dao",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "openalex"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.3643.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "DAO Legal Forms Around the World",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198946113.003.0002"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:3652481-013",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3652481-013",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations – Internal Governance and External Legal Design (2020). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3652481",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations – Internal Governance and External Legal Design",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2020",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=3652481",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "530b3a40c244aeca2eb4c53f4c9b4d6b2962bd6be9f92b4ebe17139c17f4c0e0"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3652481-013"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "DAO Legal Forms Around the World",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198946113.003.0002"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0003",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6101",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6101.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:5ef80d9e7cbf3798e2fd",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.3643,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: dao, legal, law, created, structure, governance, human. Scope: the DAO has no off chain legal entity; a dispute reaches a court.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "openalex",
  "sourceRecordId": "https://openalex.org/W7125825609",
  "queryId": "concept:ee778ad15ea3",
  "queryText": "decentralized autonomous organization",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198946113.003.0002",
  "doi": "10.1093/law/9780198946113.003.0002",
  "externalIds": {
   "OpenAlex": "https://openalex.org/W7125825609",
   "DOI": "10.1093/law/9780198946113.003.0002"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T17:52:11.122Z",
  "providerPage": 9,
  "rawObservationSha256": "b10f89fb6b95a4c97ff9cc7565fd397fec608701ba2efa3aca4330e6e3e102f3",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "bdb2cd83e925a3abd26bab9a4375d1355c1d8fbab8736869dc7845f3ba159924",
  "inputLine": 9128,
  "chunkId": "openalex-00004",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.1093/law/9780198946113.003.0002",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Nina Reiser"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2026-01-22",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.1093/law/9780198946113.003.0002",
   "openalex:https://openalex.org/w7125825609",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198946113.003.0002",
   "title:6f2c7762a6961b96593bb559",
   "proposition:d4d0627b6c0ef59b86f6bbc1f03748268390747266fa0f8436405f095d02c702"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "The DAO Model Law created a well-founded basis for the legal structure of DAO companies based on functional and legal equivalence.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "a99913460d1d61d95975dda7b9dfc280c4bb241897cc283fc06f4cce05dfc173",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 2,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3652481-013",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3652481-013",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.3643,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: dao, legal, law, created, structure, governance, human. Scope: the DAO has no off chain legal entity; a dispute reaches a court.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5254152-015",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5254152-015",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3334,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: dao, legal, law, structure, foundation. Scope: DAOs that need to interact with real world legal entities.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3652481-024",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3652481-024",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3316,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: dao, legal, law, legislature, governance. Scope: jurisdictions with a consumer protection mandate.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3799320-020",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3799320-020",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.3224,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: dao, legal, law, structure, rights. Scope: DAOs running on public decentralized blockchain platforms.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2922176-036",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2922176-036",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3223,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: dao, companies, corporate, governance, rights. Scope: the original DAO structure, running on the Ethereum public blockchain.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0003, SHA-256 8afd77518bf3e6dff3e21ea20524a254cd29e7e4678a80362a24c26c8dc039e2, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "3229204ce358ffa308ba02dff7f867ad20fc7adf0cac328ad673d5d23b5f9271"
}