{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6135",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-6135",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Suing A Dao Articulations Of Legal Personhood And Service Of Process In  0C59F9041A",
 "text": "Suing a DAO: Articulations of Legal Personhood and Service of Process in Recent Litigation presents the following source proposition: litigation that attempts to bring decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) into traditional court systems by grappling with questions of legal personhood and procedural norms. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Overcoming attempts by rational and opportunistic internal and external constituents to game a DAO's governance design requires a duality of incentives, in which actors improve their own utility while their actions simultaneously benefit the whole institution over the long run. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "risk-and-incentives",
  "regulatory-failure",
  "dao",
  "governance-design",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "openalex"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.3501.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Suing a DAO: Articulations of Legal Personhood and Service of Process in Recent Litigation",
  "url": "https://hdl.handle.net/2346/104509"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:3652481-019",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3652481-019",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations – Internal Governance and External Legal Design (2020). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3652481",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations – Internal Governance and External Legal Design",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2020",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=3652481",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "530b3a40c244aeca2eb4c53f4c9b4d6b2962bd6be9f92b4ebe17139c17f4c0e0"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3652481-019"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Suing a DAO: Articulations of Legal Personhood and Service of Process in Recent Litigation",
   "url": "https://hdl.handle.net/2346/104509"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0003",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6135",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6135.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:37b41f1eb29d2f66ad21",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.3501,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: dao, legal, attempts, decentralized, autonomous, organizations, actions, human. Scope: review source claim scope.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "openalex",
  "sourceRecordId": "https://openalex.org/W7124363566",
  "queryId": "concept:ee778ad15ea3",
  "queryText": "decentralized autonomous organization",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://hdl.handle.net/2346/104509",
  "doi": null,
  "externalIds": {
   "OpenAlex": "https://openalex.org/W7124363566"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T17:52:11.122Z",
  "providerPage": 9,
  "rawObservationSha256": "7efeb85d5152f2f04edbd6323d82a2c6dfdfb909efd7eebeee94bc3e00da85b3",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "bdb2cd83e925a3abd26bab9a4375d1355c1d8fbab8736869dc7845f3ba159924",
  "inputLine": 9222,
  "chunkId": "openalex-00004",
  "workId": "work:openalex:https://openalex.org/W7124363566",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Catherine Martin Christopher"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2025-01-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "openalex:https://openalex.org/W7124363566",
   "openalex:https://openalex.org/w7124363566",
   "url:https://hdl.handle.net/2346/104509",
   "title:3d2541603ab3693cb6c297dc",
   "proposition:104ed3f0f9e0ef8445618c8f29bb6425c6fb204c7cd37808f82bbede010230bc"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "litigation that attempts to bring decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) into traditional court systems by grappling with questions of legal personhood and procedural norms.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "76a7562217a131f1f979099367d0384b9137617ecb4a427667077689dd588f7b",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 0,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3652481-019",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3652481-019",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.3501,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: dao, legal, attempts, decentralized, autonomous, organizations, actions, human. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:4529715-024",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4529715-024",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3433,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: dao, legal, decentralized, autonomous, organizations, daos, law, resolution. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3652481-040",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3652481-040",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3422,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: dao, legal, decentralized, autonomous, organizations, daos, law, actions. Scope: no off chain legal entity has been formed.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3652481-016",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3652481-016",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.3404,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: dao, legal, decentralized, autonomous, organizations, traditional, common, law. Scope: the system is cybernetic, meaning the community continually chooses which protocol version to adopt.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5554218-033",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5554218-033",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3367,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: dao, legal, decentralized, autonomous, organizations, daos, law, human. Scope: conflicts that fall outside the scope of the coded terms.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0003, SHA-256 8afd77518bf3e6dff3e21ea20524a254cd29e7e4678a80362a24c26c8dc039e2, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "0c962b9a7cb564de083778e55b5287380c5b2efdf18ddf5c3bb0eae784ae3732"
}