{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6212",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-6212",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Civil Law Issues Of Smart Contracts Focusing On The Dao Case 1A0A9B50A7",
 "text": "Civil law issues of Smart Contracts: Focusing on the DAO case presents the following source proposition: 이 글에서는 특히 이더리움 기반의 DAO(Decentralized Autonomous Organization) 사건의 경위를 소개하고 분석함으로써, 이러한 문제점들을 발굴하고 부각하고자 하였다. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that A decentralized autonomous organization is merely computer code with no directors, managers or employees, its governance structure built with software, code and smart contracts running on a public decentralized blockchain platform. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "dao",
  "smart-contracts",
  "blockchain",
  "governance-design",
  "corporate-governance",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "openalex"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.4473.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Civil law issues of Smart Contracts: Focusing on the DAO case",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.52554/kjcl.2022.99.203"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:3227967-023",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227967-023",
  "citation": "Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in a Digital Age Why 'Coding for Lawyers' Matters (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227967",
  "paper": "Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in a Digital Age Why 'Coding for Lawyers' Matters",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2018",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227967",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "f6e13b956f864ab32ec3305d095a35a127770327d75b3688f785cefc437d369f"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227967-023"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Civil law issues of Smart Contracts: Focusing on the DAO case",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.52554/kjcl.2022.99.203"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0003",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6212",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6212.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:b8fd0f90586c8a0ca50a",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.4473,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: smart, contracts, dao, decentralized, autonomous, organization, computer, blockchain. Scope: DAOs built on public platforms, in most cases Ethereum.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "openalex",
  "sourceRecordId": "https://openalex.org/W4292685013",
  "queryId": "concept:ee778ad15ea3",
  "queryText": "decentralized autonomous organization",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.52554/kjcl.2022.99.203",
  "doi": "10.52554/kjcl.2022.99.203",
  "externalIds": {
   "OpenAlex": "https://openalex.org/W4292685013",
   "DOI": "10.52554/kjcl.2022.99.203"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T17:52:13.866Z",
  "providerPage": 12,
  "rawObservationSha256": "8a3d9ec033ae0db7f535399f90ba925c86dac5980b6aad92a0108d3a876110de",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "bdb2cd83e925a3abd26bab9a4375d1355c1d8fbab8736869dc7845f3ba159924",
  "inputLine": 9736,
  "chunkId": "openalex-00007",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.52554/kjcl.2022.99.203",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Jihye Shin"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2022-06-30",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.52554/kjcl.2022.99.203",
   "openalex:https://openalex.org/w4292685013",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.52554/kjcl.2022.99.203",
   "title:cbaf59157af77262454dfa67",
   "proposition:0da1b0adcab233e7b3662bcc1202dacc32935448e8315ea62a5f9ea5182c9eef"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "이 글에서는 특히 이더리움 기반의 DAO(Decentralized Autonomous Organization) 사건의 경위를 소개하고 분석함으로써, 이러한 문제점들을 발굴하고 부각하고자 하였다.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "a0c1b0fd91e0a5d2bcbc77937a37d103b10f8c9932e8a3fc7b52d14e18aa5b50",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 2,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3227967-023",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227967-023",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.4473,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: smart, contracts, dao, decentralized, autonomous, organization, computer, blockchain. Scope: DAOs built on public platforms, in most cases Ethereum.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3125822-028",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3125822-028",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.4395,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: law, smart, contracts, decentralized, autonomous, contract, blockchain, dispute. Scope: applies to smart contracts with a break clause and a third party arbiter.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2992962-017",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-017",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.412,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: law, smart, contracts, contract, computer, dispute, resolution. Scope: contract interpretation disputes over coded smart contracts.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2922176-036",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2922176-036",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.4027,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: smart, contracts, dao, decentralized, autonomous, organization, contract, blockchain. Scope: the original DAO structure, running on the Ethereum public blockchain.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3652481-040",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3652481-040",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.394,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: civil, law, dao, decentralized, autonomous, organization, actions. Scope: no off chain legal entity has been formed.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0003, SHA-256 8afd77518bf3e6dff3e21ea20524a254cd29e7e4678a80362a24c26c8dc039e2, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "4040c486900e76a1625f0c20989b71bbe96be23723bf7a11ef31d771c481e135"
}