{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6250",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-6250",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Online Dispute Resolution For Smart Contracts 592F2327F6",
 "text": "Online Dispute Resolution for Smart Contracts presents the following source proposition: At the same time, disputes regarding smart contracts are inevitable, and par-ties will need means for dealing with smart contract issues. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Because smart contracts are coded for computer programming rather than for a human observer, courts may not be able to hypothesize a reasonable human's interpretation of a given smart contract. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "law-and-legal-systems",
  "smart-contracts",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "openalex"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.3768.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Online Dispute Resolution for Smart Contracts",
  "url": "https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/facpubs/726"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:2992962-017",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-017",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2017",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-017"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Online Dispute Resolution for Smart Contracts",
   "url": "https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/facpubs/726"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0003",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6250",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6250.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:dedd36a41117473370b6",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.3768,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: dispute, resolution, smart, contracts, contract, law, computer, artificial. Scope: contract interpretation disputes over coded smart contracts.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "openalex",
  "sourceRecordId": "https://openalex.org/W2955198603",
  "queryId": "concept:ee778ad15ea3",
  "queryText": "decentralized autonomous organization",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/facpubs/726",
  "doi": null,
  "externalIds": {
   "OpenAlex": "https://openalex.org/W2955198603",
   "MAG": "2955198603"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T17:52:14.779Z",
  "providerPage": 13,
  "rawObservationSha256": "54dfc57d03a6236b8788ec4b69005bb8c65022c9363b811302b3a60d42ebf54a",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "bdb2cd83e925a3abd26bab9a4375d1355c1d8fbab8736869dc7845f3ba159924",
  "inputLine": 9981,
  "chunkId": "openalex-00008",
  "workId": "work:openalex:https://openalex.org/W2955198603",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Amy J. Schmitz"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2019-06-26",
  "identityKeys": [
   "openalex:https://openalex.org/W2955198603",
   "openalex:https://openalex.org/w2955198603",
   "url:https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/facpubs/726",
   "title:ca8d588a77aa38984567a2ce",
   "proposition:c5b119d1371513ae04f5eb18c423ed3f7616f10a8ca77a73fb0a5f99c272209f"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "At the same time, disputes regarding smart contracts are inevitable, and par-ties will need means for dealing with smart contract issues.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "21315acb4dbe97efabe6f03990ece9b27a94ba6fda5c271fc549869051b51c75",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 1,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2992962-017",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-017",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.3768,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: dispute, resolution, smart, contracts, contract, law, computer, artificial. Scope: contract interpretation disputes over coded smart contracts.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2992962-013",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-013",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3356,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: dispute, resolution, smart, contracts, means, contract, business, law. Scope: smart contracts where parties are anonymized by public-key encryption and VPNs.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2992962-021",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-021",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3242,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: dispute, resolution, smart, contracts, disputes, contract, law. Scope: fully decentralized and autonomous blockchains.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3709041-039",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3709041-039",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.3207,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: dispute, resolution, smart, contracts, contract, alternative, law. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2992962-015",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-015",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3195,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: dispute, resolution, smart, contracts, means, contract, law. Scope: consumer smart contracts with a physical performance element.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0003, SHA-256 8afd77518bf3e6dff3e21ea20524a254cd29e7e4678a80362a24c26c8dc039e2, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "692f5e46f24e74ada997e24f30aac1dba42ac83701485bda50d968b8becb967c"
}