{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6256",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-6256",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming A Systematic Literature Review On Blockchain Consensus Mechanisms Securi 5E637500Fb",
 "text": "A Systematic Literature Review on Blockchain Consensus Mechanisms’ Security: Applications and Open Challenges presents the following source proposition: This study conducts a systematic literature review (SLR) of blockchain consensus mechanisms, an essential protocols that maintain the integrity, reliability, and decentralization of distributed ledger networks. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Recentralization is the central obstacle to using blockchain and distributed ledger technology to govern AI: the recentralizing tendency of these networks interferes with their capacity to deliver effective AI governance. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "decentralization",
  "blockchain",
  "governance-design",
  "ai-and-agents",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "openalex"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.3629.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "A Systematic Literature Review on Blockchain Consensus Mechanisms’ Security: Applications and Open Challenges",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.32604/csse.2024.054556"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:4796714-012",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4796714-012",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, AI Governance (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4796714",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, AI Governance",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2024",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=4796714",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "59fa63bae179e8f9b6b8efbdf90cee28400276512a1b04f9f579a48641305c93"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4796714-012"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "A Systematic Literature Review on Blockchain Consensus Mechanisms’ Security: Applications and Open Challenges",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.32604/csse.2024.054556"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0004",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6256",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6256.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:ef469091c39e7d5a34fd",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.3629,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: blockchain, decentralization, distributed, ledger, networks, technology. Scope: applies to blockchain and DLT based AI governance proposals; observed in Layer 1 networks as of 2024.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "openalex",
  "sourceRecordId": "https://openalex.org/W4404192465",
  "queryId": "concept:ee778ad15ea3",
  "queryText": "decentralized autonomous organization",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.32604/csse.2024.054556",
  "doi": "10.32604/csse.2024.054556",
  "externalIds": {
   "OpenAlex": "https://openalex.org/W4404192465",
   "DOI": "10.32604/csse.2024.054556"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T17:52:14.779Z",
  "providerPage": 13,
  "rawObservationSha256": "9ce678741e4c32b5ab49617044dd6c19bdc52f07a532e83e2d6d3267432e9a56",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "bdb2cd83e925a3abd26bab9a4375d1355c1d8fbab8736869dc7845f3ba159924",
  "inputLine": 10020,
  "chunkId": "openalex-00001",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.32604/csse.2024.054556",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Muhammad Muntasir Yakubu",
   "Mohd Fadzil Hassan",
   "Kamaluddeen Usman Danyaro",
   "Aisha Zahid Junejo",
   "Muhammed Siraj",
   "Saidu Yahaya",
   "Shamsuddeen Adamu",
   "Kamal Abdulsalam"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2024-01-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.32604/csse.2024.054556",
   "openalex:https://openalex.org/w4404192465",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.32604/csse.2024.054556",
   "title:6607fa228543c03af19f305f",
   "proposition:a948ac1159439d2a07e085ec56a1d6bf56fcac1064c39c4eb8fc15d3a6952e11"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "This study conducts a systematic literature review (SLR) of blockchain consensus mechanisms, an essential protocols that maintain the integrity, reliability, and decentralization of distributed ledger networks.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "4bd518d87bce746556e7b3201579415c2c164da8b33f4de0b7321302c92bfe53",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 0,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:4796714-012",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4796714-012",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.3629,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: blockchain, decentralization, distributed, ledger, networks, technology. Scope: applies to blockchain and DLT based AI governance proposals; observed in Layer 1 networks as of 2024.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3411110-030",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3411110-030",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.353,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: blockchain, maintain, distributed, ledger, networks. Scope: Delaware corporate law after the 2017 DGCL amendment; records must be convertible into legible paper form.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3808873-033",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3808873-033",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3484,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: blockchain, consensus, security, protocols, decentralization, networks. Scope: blockchain protocols requiring upgrades in the early 2020s.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:4855607-035",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4855607-035",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.347,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: consensus, mechanisms, integrity, reliability, decentralization. Scope: RLHF pipelines where feedback can be verified prior to reward model training.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3782198-024",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782198-024",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3447,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: consensus, security, decentralization, ledger, computer. Scope: applies to proof of work networks where mining rewards create economies of scale.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0004, SHA-256 76656a95748a5e70056673ed7e170eaf52eb7b843129dad96311bc6e84b0ce9f, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "2a3d444adc707a8f7420e20797714c80b00938c511e9348e69d87be98273af66"
}