kaal:position:2026-07-31-6417

Juridical Overview of the Use of Smart Contracts in Indonesia as a Form of Artificial Intelligence Development presents the following source proposition: Stages to find the target, then used the approach through legislation (statute approach). This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Because smart contracts are coded for computer programming rather than for a human observer, courts may not be able to hypothesize a reasonable human's interpretation of a given smart contract. The proposed response is an agreement: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.

• The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
• External evidence level: abstract indexed.
• Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.
• Primary mapping confidence: 0.3599.
• The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation.

Juridical Overview of the Use of Smart Contracts in Indonesia as a Form of Artificial Intelligence Development

kaal:claim:2992962-017
Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962
Source PDF sha256: 80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17

Evidence: abstract indexed
Review tier: moderate-confidence claim review
Mapping confidence: 0.3599
Mapping ambiguous: true

law-and-legal-systemssmart-contractshistorical-responsescholarly-literatureopenalex

Affirmed in kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0004 on 2026-07-31. Review record.

Canonical markdown sha256: 9d9f33e9273ff9cd1662160f4b878c6863f33841d62732aaefa5a66d9bd12531
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6417.md | sha256sum