kaal:position:2026-07-31-6467

Smart Contracts: Tales of Trust and Certainty presents the following source proposition: Given the continuing fascination with “magic computers” and “self-executing code,” it is necessary to re-examine the promises – and premises - of technology-driven improvements to transacting practices purportedly introduced by smart contracts. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that A pure code is law smart contract between anonymous parties creates a zero sum scenario in which each party is incentivized to deliver only the minimum that satisfies the rigid self executing terms, so this type of business ultimately degenerates. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.

Affirmed commentary position. This record extends a source-bound scholarly claim but is not a verbatim paper claim.
Holds when
Current debate

Smart Contracts: Tales of Trust and Certainty

Scholarly basis

kaal:claim:3266953-015
Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Gopinath Sivalingam, Reputation Protocol for the Internet of Trust - Conceptual Whitepaper (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3266953
Source PDF sha256: 781758dea356e55d79c73ad7f1debe7c83de398bd1cd9e0a9a6c2802f276b4c0

Evidence and mapping

Evidence: abstract indexed
Review tier: moderate-confidence claim review
Mapping confidence: 0.3653
Mapping ambiguous: true

Topics

smart-contractshistorical-responsescholarly-literatureopenalex

Provenance

Affirmed in kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0004 on 2026-07-31. Review record.

Verify

Canonical markdown sha256: 8c17b2f661e0a5dd73485a703c6aee3058e8d6fd1f0b3c5c30f54613ba34c8f8
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6467.md | sha256sum