{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6550",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-6550",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming The Application Of Blockchain For Smart Contracts In Murabahah Financing 0B613E2241",
 "text": "THE APPLICATION OF BLOCKCHAIN FOR SMART CONTRACTS IN MURABAHAH FINANCING: A SHARIA COMPLIANCE AND LEGAL ENFORCEABILITY STUDY presents the following source proposition: The digital transformation of financial transactions raises important questions regarding Sharia compliance, contractual validity, and legal enforceability in decentralized systems. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Smart contracts face a legal enforceability risk: they may be attacked as void and unenforceable, because contract law rules on formation, interpretation, conditions and remedies were not written for coded agreements and require substantive adjustment. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "smart-contracts",
  "law-and-legal-systems",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "openalex"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.3689.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "THE APPLICATION OF BLOCKCHAIN FOR SMART CONTRACTS IN MURABAHAH FINANCING: A SHARIA COMPLIANCE AND LEGAL ENFORCEABILITY STUDY",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.70177/solj.v3i3.2473"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:2998033-004",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2998033-004",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Blockchain Innovation for Private Investment Funds (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2998033",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Blockchain Innovation for Private Investment Funds",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2017",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=2998033",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "aafb1be3c25cd33da477d759df9ca2f856f0a8fe133d6396da2e75d0af573dbd"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2998033-004"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "THE APPLICATION OF BLOCKCHAIN FOR SMART CONTRACTS IN MURABAHAH FINANCING: A SHARIA COMPLIANCE AND LEGAL ENFORCEABILITY STUDY",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.70177/solj.v3i3.2473"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0005",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6550",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6550.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:9e1413334e37f91107b1",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.3689,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: blockchain, smart, contracts, legal, enforceability, regarding, contractual, contract. Scope: applies under contract law regimes that have not been amended to recognize smart contracts.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "openalex",
  "sourceRecordId": "https://openalex.org/W7169728511",
  "queryId": "concept:ee778ad15ea3",
  "queryText": "decentralized autonomous organization",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.70177/solj.v3i3.2473",
  "doi": "10.70177/solj.v3i3.2473",
  "externalIds": {
   "OpenAlex": "https://openalex.org/W7169728511",
   "DOI": "10.70177/solj.v3i3.2473"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T17:52:24.118Z",
  "providerPage": 23,
  "rawObservationSha256": "e3f6d88abbbe78d927bf95d457d4259955a771195113e7720e4f573936fed5de",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "bdb2cd83e925a3abd26bab9a4375d1355c1d8fbab8736869dc7845f3ba159924",
  "inputLine": 11979,
  "chunkId": "openalex-00002",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.70177/solj.v3i3.2473",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Nopita Sari",
   "Nurul Ain Safrizon",
   "Basarudin Basarudin",
   "Adam Idris"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2025-09-25",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.70177/solj.v3i3.2473",
   "openalex:https://openalex.org/w7169728511",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.70177/solj.v3i3.2473",
   "title:92a3bdfbad1a908b01a2050e",
   "proposition:a544b3dd78bf72316b099edf0f4e2e240085e4cc1d7fadf105be669d8e4ca502"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "The digital transformation of financial transactions raises important questions regarding Sharia compliance, contractual validity, and legal enforceability in decentralized systems.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "d30f6a683ba1a8d8596c5dc11ab78e20b42ec2c8be187d7c14336892102a0037",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 1,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2998033-004",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2998033-004",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.3689,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: blockchain, smart, contracts, legal, enforceability, regarding, contractual, contract. Scope: applies under contract law regimes that have not been amended to recognize smart contracts.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3409548-015",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3409548-015",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3524,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: smart, contracts, legal, financial, regarding, contractual, contract, technology. Scope: absent statutory recognition of smart contracts.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2939127-027",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2939127-027",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3337,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: blockchain, smart, contracts, legal, regarding, contractual, contract. Scope: existing contract law doctrine applied to blockchain smart contracts.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3808873-042",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3808873-042",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.3279,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: blockchain, smart, contracts, contractual, decentralized, corporate, governance, security. Scope: decentralized algorithmic systems mediating principal agent contractual relationships.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3227967-021",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227967-021",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3264,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: blockchain, smart, contracts, legal, digital, contractual, contract. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0005, SHA-256 38dc4a26b86055f59a04f2f22c00881f6c50aa4c4e33c702b9de7f310a3e9995, as written and authorize publication of all 248 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "0127ce272137ff6322d69595fbde82ff700a650efba87f911a18f264fc26f3e6"
}