kaal:position:2026-07-31-6572
Alternatif dispute resolution mechanisms in fintech: addressing legal challenges in digital financial services presents the following source proposition: Traditional litigation methods are often inadequate in addressing the unique complexities of fintech, such as cross-border transactions, data breaches, and the use of smart contracts. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Posting cryptocurrency to escrow like smart contracts is often uneconomic compared with traditional financial instruments, and this inefficiency undermines the practical utility of smart contracts as a vehicle for consideration, especially in high value or long term agreements. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
smart-contractslaw-and-legal-systemshistorical-responsescholarly-literatureopenalex