{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "Claim",
"@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6685",
"identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-6685",
"additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
"name": "Streaming The Scp Unidroit Scp Principles And The Inflexibility Of Code As Law Rec Efe9303B5C",
"text": "The Unidroit Principles and the inflexibility of code as law: reconciling smart contracts with general clauses presents the following source proposition: These technologies follow a deterministic, if/then logic that is often difficult to reconcile with the inherent malleability of contract law. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Smart contracts fail to accommodate human business interaction because code does not follow the same logic on similar terms as natural human language, so the flexibility in interpreting intent that human dealings require cannot be ensured. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
"author": {
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
"identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
},
"datePublished": "2026-07-31",
"dateModified": "2026-07-31",
"creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
"responseType": "extension",
"keywords": [
"smart-contracts",
"historical-response",
"scholarly-literature",
"openalex"
],
"scope_conditions": [
"The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
"External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
"Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
"Primary mapping confidence: 0.3658.",
"The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
],
"currentDebate": {
"name": "The Unidroit Principles and the inflexibility of code as law: reconciling smart contracts with general clauses",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unae014"
},
"extends": {
"identifier": "kaal:claim:3406323-032",
"url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3406323-032",
"citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralization - A Primer on the New Economy (2019). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3406323",
"paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralization - A Primer on the New Economy",
"authors": [
"Wulf A. Kaal"
],
"year": "2019",
"ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=3406323",
"source_pdf_sha256": "6293780b57a1ae1de17ec00f99cc94295d4f72ea4d08b17a5c08c44772b221db"
},
"isBasedOn": [
{
"@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3406323-032"
},
{
"@type": "CreativeWork",
"name": "The Unidroit Principles and the inflexibility of code as law: reconciling smart contracts with general clauses",
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unae014"
}
],
"batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0005",
"review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
"publicationStatus": "public",
"recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
"isPartOf": {
"@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
},
"version": "1.0",
"canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6685",
"canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6685.md",
"candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:817c50a35bf6378f39ba",
"evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
"reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
"mappingConfidence": 0.3658,
"mappingAmbiguous": true,
"mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
"mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: code, smart, contracts, follow, logic, contract, flexibility, business. Scope: human business interactions requiring interpretation of intent.",
"sourceProvenance": {
"source": "openalex",
"sourceRecordId": "https://openalex.org/W4393719085",
"queryId": "concept:ee778ad15ea3",
"queryText": "decentralized autonomous organization",
"canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unae014",
"doi": "10.1093/ulr/unae014",
"externalIds": {
"OpenAlex": "https://openalex.org/W4393719085",
"DOI": "10.1093/ulr/unae014"
},
"retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T17:52:28.136Z",
"providerPage": 28,
"rawObservationSha256": "88ed90c674e062ddc1de3b91a3c4b450592f6a6fe20affa66d73937db9c077c5",
"inputSnapshotSha256": "bdb2cd83e925a3abd26bab9a4375d1355c1d8fbab8736869dc7845f3ba159924",
"inputLine": 12922,
"chunkId": "openalex-00005",
"workId": "work:doi:10.1093/ulr/unae014",
"workAuthors": [
"Olaf Meyer",
"Pietro Ortolani"
],
"workPublishedAt": "2023-12-01",
"identityKeys": [
"doi:10.1093/ulr/unae014",
"openalex:https://openalex.org/w4393719085",
"url:https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unae014",
"title:5426cffaf8054ceb87dd2e7f",
"proposition:4c1dd5d4ae7a9823bba9ae8792b132c1256963c6b02825c7fae7c1c496e32246"
],
"sourceProposition": "These technologies follow a deterministic, if/then logic that is often difficult to reconcile with the inherent malleability of contract law.",
"sourcePropositionSha256": "714a7367813313ad0252156994d58792743c4ababa6e46131d7076254ccdb395",
"sourcePropositionIndex": 0,
"claimMappings": [
{
"claimId": "kaal:claim:3406323-032",
"claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3406323-032",
"rank": 1,
"confidence": 0.3658,
"method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
"whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: code, smart, contracts, follow, logic, contract, flexibility, business. Scope: human business interactions requiring interpretation of intent.",
"ambiguous": true
},
{
"claimId": "kaal:claim:2959730-022",
"claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2959730-022",
"rank": 2,
"confidence": 0.3597,
"method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
"whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: law, smart, contracts, clauses, logic, often, contract, abstract. Scope: contract terms whose logic can be expressed in computer code.",
"ambiguous": true
},
{
"claimId": "kaal:claim:2998033-002",
"claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2998033-002",
"rank": 3,
"confidence": 0.3597,
"method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
"whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: law, smart, contracts, clauses, logic, often, contract, abstract. Scope: applies to transactions whose terms can be expressed as executable code.",
"ambiguous": true
},
{
"claimId": "kaal:claim:3002908-018",
"claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3002908-018",
"rank": 4,
"confidence": 0.3597,
"method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
"whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: law, smart, contracts, clauses, logic, often, contract, abstract. Scope: review source claim scope.",
"ambiguous": true
},
{
"claimId": "kaal:claim:3405401-010",
"claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3405401-010",
"rank": 5,
"confidence": 0.3503,
"method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
"whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: code, smart, contracts, follow, logic, contract, flexibility, abstract. Scope: interpretation of party intent is required.",
"ambiguous": true
}
]
},
"userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0005, SHA-256 38dc4a26b86055f59a04f2f22c00881f6c50aa4c4e33c702b9de7f310a3e9995, as written and authorize publication of all 248 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
"sha256": "b3b52de01bb43ff29f4f31f42b599e8ef8d7b61bacdb46327be963d6a6e41ab1"
}