{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6724",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-6724",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Accessible Smart Contracts Verification Synthesizing Formal Models With  Cc0Fddc80A",
 "text": "Accessible Smart Contracts Verification: Synthesizing Formal Models with Tamed LLMs presents the following source proposition: One of the most powerful ways of establishing software correctness is by using formal methods. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Because smart contracts are coded for computer programming rather than for a human observer, courts may not be able to hypothesize a reasonable human's interpretation of a given smart contract. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "law-and-legal-systems",
  "smart-contracts",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "openalex"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.4431.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Accessible Smart Contracts Verification: Synthesizing Formal Models with Tamed LLMs",
  "url": "http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.12972"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:2992962-017",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-017",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2017",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-017"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Accessible Smart Contracts Verification: Synthesizing Formal Models with Tamed LLMs",
   "url": "http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.12972"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0005",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6724",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6724.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:9441f1f118718ff2995b",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.4431,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: smart, contracts, computer, contract, law, artificial, intelligence. Scope: contract interpretation disputes over coded smart contracts.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "openalex",
  "sourceRecordId": "https://openalex.org/W4406779554",
  "queryId": "concept:ee778ad15ea3",
  "queryText": "decentralized autonomous organization",
  "canonicalUrl": "http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.12972",
  "doi": "10.48550/arxiv.2501.12972",
  "externalIds": {
   "OpenAlex": "https://openalex.org/W4406779554",
   "DOI": "10.48550/arxiv.2501.12972"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T17:52:29.639Z",
  "providerPage": 30,
  "rawObservationSha256": "db1727b0d08dd0277446ecea77c82b0d3416113cf111e946f85767ee52a0eec4",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "bdb2cd83e925a3abd26bab9a4375d1355c1d8fbab8736869dc7845f3ba159924",
  "inputLine": 13288,
  "chunkId": "openalex-00007",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.12972",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Jan Corazza",
   "Ivan Gavran",
   "Gabriela Moreira",
   "Daniel Neider"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2025-01-22",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.12972",
   "openalex:https://openalex.org/w4406779554",
   "url:http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.12972",
   "title:919fc7805273b44ecc6f84ee",
   "proposition:3cf78838c97262a2c803e333c6543a4d02e522f4aeeddfee939dd5b06a5fac46"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "One of the most powerful ways of establishing software correctness is by using formal methods.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "bfae2ffc0e2180c9a86f82937a698026af545abdf957db1886c492c8fb980ea7",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 2,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2992962-017",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-017",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.4431,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: smart, contracts, computer, contract, law, artificial, intelligence. Scope: contract interpretation disputes over coded smart contracts.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3227967-021",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227967-021",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3912,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: smart, contracts, verification, computer, contract, law. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3227967-023",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227967-023",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3694,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: smart, contracts, most, software, computer. Scope: DAOs built on public platforms, in most cases Ethereum.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3227933-017",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227933-017",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.3691,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: smart, contracts, verification, computer, contract. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3405401-008",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3405401-008",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3656,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: smart, contracts, verification, most, contract, law. Scope: something goes wrong in execution of the contract terms.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0005, SHA-256 38dc4a26b86055f59a04f2f22c00881f6c50aa4c4e33c702b9de7f310a3e9995, as written and authorize publication of all 248 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "51f495c6f003eea9bebc2588125a996a2c980ef60c84265e618dbed55c86ad5c"
}