kaal:position:2026-07-31-6844

Enforcement of smart contracts in cross-jurisdictional transactions presents the following source proposition: Design/methodology/approach To achieve the aim of this study, doctrinal legal analysis was adopted. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Escrow based enforcement is effective for automation only if it is supported by reliable oracles and robust governance, without which the mechanism is open to manipulation. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.

• The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
• External evidence level: abstract indexed.
• Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.
• Primary mapping confidence: 0.4987.
• The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation.

Enforcement of smart contracts in cross-jurisdictional transactions

kaal:claim:5554218-018
Furrer Andreas, Wulf A. Kaal, Universal Digital Law Codex (UDLC) Building the Legal Infrastructure for the Digital Era (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5554218
Source PDF sha256: 55738b4035a91b70aa2ddaa127552fe4b373ec641afee2719fbdcabebdcbea44

Evidence: abstract indexed
Review tier: moderate-confidence claim review
Mapping confidence: 0.4987
Mapping ambiguous: true

smart-contractsgovernance-designcompliancehistorical-responsescholarly-literaturesemantic-scholar

Affirmed in kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0006 on 2026-07-31. Review record.

Canonical markdown sha256: 0865c838c6626e350019d18766122cb77fdc8b5c8615f31c77c59882552c772b
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6844.md | sha256sum