{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6848",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-6848",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming A Secure And Decentralized Blockchain Based Electronic Voting Framework  C3881730Bc",
 "text": "A Secure and Decentralized Blockchain-Based Electronic Voting Framework with Smart Contract Enforcement presents the following source proposition: Traditional centralized voting architectures suffer from limitations such as single points of failure, limited auditability, and vulnerability to data manipulation. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Traditional jurisdictional tests fail for blockchain because the concepts of location and presence do not apply: the blockchain has no location, physical or electronic, and no single node holds the entire chain. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "law-and-legal-systems",
  "blockchain",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "semantic-scholar"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.3811.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "A Secure and Decentralized Blockchain-Based Electronic Voting Framework with Smart Contract Enforcement",
  "url": "https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5c54b2d6eb5186c6f33a04c176f696c814003f6f"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:3002908-006",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3002908-006",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Marco Dell'Erba, Blockchain Innovation in Private Investment Funds - A Comparative Analysis of the United States and (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3002908",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Marco Dell'Erba, Blockchain Innovation in Private Investment Funds - A Comparative Analysis of the United States and",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2017",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=3002908",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "06a7b61e75f905ee07e422e875d83a65c5033a248a6e05a213523b034e5db534"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3002908-006"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "A Secure and Decentralized Blockchain-Based Electronic Voting Framework with Smart Contract Enforcement",
   "url": "https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5c54b2d6eb5186c6f33a04c176f696c814003f6f"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0006",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6848",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-6848.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:edd59e8e1913632e9e76",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.3811,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: blockchain, electronic, traditional, single. Scope: review source claim scope.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "semantic-scholar",
  "sourceRecordId": "5c54b2d6eb5186c6f33a04c176f696c814003f6f",
  "queryId": "concept:c8f592cb6b0b",
  "queryText": "smart contract enforceability",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5c54b2d6eb5186c6f33a04c176f696c814003f6f",
  "doi": "10.59256/indjcst.20260501024",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.59256/indjcst.20260501024",
   "CorpusId": 286379611,
   "SemanticScholar": "5c54b2d6eb5186c6f33a04c176f696c814003f6f"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T13:58:41.961Z",
  "providerPage": 1,
  "rawObservationSha256": "cda1ae3043785f263ae253c5e28052cb1762c1479570543e2439637723084b74",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "96a846999aefd65306457ebd7971f1abef182a04b39a927618f8460274d795ab",
  "inputLine": 10100,
  "chunkId": "semantic-scholar-00041",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.59256/indjcst.20260501024",
  "workAuthors": [
   "G. Lokesh Kumar",
   "Kumar Sumit",
   "Baheti Prashant Kumar"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2026-03-06",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.59256/indjcst.20260501024",
   "semantic-scholar:5c54b2d6eb5186c6f33a04c176f696c814003f6f",
   "url:https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5c54b2d6eb5186c6f33a04c176f696c814003f6f",
   "title:8f2bf8226e499f0bada1d469",
   "proposition:842e6b539994b4c9d832bab147bca325b4a7dc8de172f4328cd29811e24f9567"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Traditional centralized voting architectures suffer from limitations such as single points of failure, limited auditability, and vulnerability to data manipulation.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "bc56253ea021164b132ef519599ec49f9a6b5f8ab8805dcc6275b31e4917c1b9",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 1,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3002908-006",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3002908-006",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.3811,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: blockchain, electronic, traditional, single. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2922176-036",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2922176-036",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3789,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: decentralized, blockchain, voting, smart, contract. Scope: the original DAO structure, running on the Ethereum public blockchain.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3227933-010",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3227933-010",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3789,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: secure, decentralized, blockchain, traditional, centralized. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3808859-039",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3808859-039",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.3644,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: secure, decentralized, blockchain, points. Scope: stated as the requirement for technological decentralization via blockchain.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3125827-001",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3125827-001",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3643,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: secure, blockchain, single, failure. Scope: distributed systems with independent, self interested nodes; protocols that are fixed rather than continually revisable.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0006, SHA-256 d724cb4e85d4ecdf4e8488b6b1c8ed999688fe58732ad5a50c5c197c25427f43, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "dfffd86cded727811ba9745e048f2ce78e7a4088c83cbdcc63bbaa7a744959c5"
}