{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-687",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-687",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Historical 6196B4F29846315874F8",
 "text": "Evaluating Algorithmic Regulation Policies: A Game Theoretic Analysis should be assessed against Kaal's source-bound claim that In the SchellingCoin approach to oracle design, members stake reputation tokens on their answer to the question a DApp is asking and are rewarded according to how close they came to the resulting median value, which functions as the game theoretic Schelling point. The current metadata indicates a plausible connection through algorithmic regulation, but the defensible response is a qualification until the source text confirms agreement, scope, methods, and limitations.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "tokenomics",
  "smart-contracts",
  "reputation"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "questions with a verifiable focal answer",
  "External evidence level: metadata only.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "The literature-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and should not be treated as a settled equivalence."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Evaluating Algorithmic Regulation Policies: A Game Theoretic Analysis",
  "url": "https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a4ae2a8f0b78b9fe27717c3e617ae72ed0e5a7e2"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782217-011",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782217-011",
  "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, The Importance of History In Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782217",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, The Importance of History In Decentralization",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2021",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782217",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "358779557d8e7dcd101720ca0fad90b9146d24f1c7c03909eb431fcf1fb7e103"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782217-011"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Evaluating Algorithmic Regulation Policies: A Game Theoretic Analysis",
   "url": "https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a4ae2a8f0b78b9fe27717c3e617ae72ed0e5a7e2"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "historical-backfill:2026-07-31:phase-0003",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-687",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-687.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-candidate:2026-07-31:efbcd57a0c8e0cb1",
 "evidenceLevel": "metadata only",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.4367,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: game, theoretic. Scope: questions with a verifiable focal answer.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "Semantic Scholar",
  "api": "https://api.semanticscholar.org/graph/v1/paper/search/bulk",
  "query": "algorithmic regulation",
  "queryId": "concept:dda0987aa1ad",
  "page": 1,
  "sourceRank": 168,
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T13:58:30.108Z",
  "citationCount": 0,
  "venue": "Social Science Research Network",
  "publicationTypes": [
   "JournalArticle"
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Approved as written by Wulf A. Kaal on 2026-07-31.",
 "sha256": "1cd1a6dff51be587de6c12278f583db1a6d61c7fd1155e79cac6f158f8b25fc3"
}