{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7131",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-7131",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Ethical Ai Governance Using Blockchain C19Acf8108",
 "text": "ETHICAL AI GOVERNANCE USING BLOCKCHAIN presents the following source proposition: Conventional governance mechanisms are primarily centralized, limiting auditability and increasing risks of bias, manipulation, and data misuse. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Smart contracts can automate compliance with regulatory requirements and ethical guidelines: for example, a smart contract can enforce privacy law directly by controlling an AI system's access to personal data according to predefined rules. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "smart-contracts",
  "compliance",
  "consensus-and-security",
  "blockchain",
  "governance-design",
  "ai-and-agents",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "semantic-scholar"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.4115.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "ETHICAL AI GOVERNANCE USING BLOCKCHAIN",
  "url": "https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eb3c8773d6bf947cf3a68cad1838b72717731f7a"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:4941807-019",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4941807-019",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, AI Governance Via Web3 Reputation System (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4941807",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, AI Governance Via Web3 Reputation System",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2024",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=4941807",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "ab66c1e99a88da1fa36b0c6b536df5184231fe6aa427f3dd53287a4e0ac79853"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4941807-019"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "ETHICAL AI GOVERNANCE USING BLOCKCHAIN",
   "url": "https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eb3c8773d6bf947cf3a68cad1838b72717731f7a"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0007",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7131",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7131.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:726d5e91af0efbf6e7c1",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.4115,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: ethical, governance, blockchain, data. Scope: where compliance rules can be expressed as predefined, codified conditions.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "semantic-scholar",
  "sourceRecordId": "eb3c8773d6bf947cf3a68cad1838b72717731f7a",
  "queryId": "concept:b78ed75f4a0b",
  "queryText": "decentralization governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eb3c8773d6bf947cf3a68cad1838b72717731f7a",
  "doi": "10.63665/rh.v7i2.34",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.63665/rh.v7i2.34",
   "CorpusId": 287297038,
   "SemanticScholar": "eb3c8773d6bf947cf3a68cad1838b72717731f7a"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T13:59:07.126Z",
  "providerPage": 2,
  "rawObservationSha256": "7f977003072366179f301187ab500d860ec9d17c9b31aee40611a091b842b34e",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "96a846999aefd65306457ebd7971f1abef182a04b39a927618f8460274d795ab",
  "inputLine": 12229,
  "chunkId": "semantic-scholar-00004",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.63665/rh.v7i2.34",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Maïté Billoré"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2026-01-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.63665/rh.v7i2.34",
   "semantic-scholar:eb3c8773d6bf947cf3a68cad1838b72717731f7a",
   "url:https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eb3c8773d6bf947cf3a68cad1838b72717731f7a",
   "title:e9001dade78480a444561631",
   "proposition:eb2598fa5d36ac41d5f7cbb8371fed94d394a61b856cead79454c651d7686308"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Conventional governance mechanisms are primarily centralized, limiting auditability and increasing risks of bias, manipulation, and data misuse.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "13bc626dc5da03277728da76553f27d3a54136573534a5b4c832bc0ac015d67a",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 1,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:4941807-019",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4941807-019",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.4115,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: ethical, governance, blockchain, data. Scope: where compliance rules can be expressed as predefined, codified conditions.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3125827-019",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3125827-019",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3949,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, blockchain, centralized, risks. Scope: off chain governance conducted privately among large holders and developers.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2922176-036",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2922176-036",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3743,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, blockchain, conventional. Scope: the original DAO structure, running on the Ethereum public blockchain.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2959730-001",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2959730-001",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.3546,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: blockchain, increasing, data. Scope: private investment fund industry; period of roughly 2007 to 2017.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3709041-001",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3709041-001",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.354,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: blockchain, centralized, risks. Scope: applies where common good objectives require coordinating many individuals.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0007, SHA-256 bf2213ee9446b647b40daf2de1dd804cd8b36c263bf153c654dd31f4a135b831, as written and authorize publication of all 154 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "f576df7aef70e4dc7ccb4ab3474b88123a66e43709fe0ea4f1f5bed079b6e9a1"
}