{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7171",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-7171",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Responsible Ai A Practitioner Playbook For Trustworthy Ai Governance 12E2291D7F",
 "text": "Responsible AI: A Practitioner Playbook for Trustworthy AI Governance presents the following source proposition: AI adoption has accelerated sharply across organisations, yet most governance efforts remain abstract or compliance-driven and do not translate into engineering practice. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Donor community votes have no binding legal effect on the 501c3 that holds the assets, yet the board will in practice follow the publicly visible voting and staking outcomes because departing from them puts the board and its long term client base at risk. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "reputation",
  "compliance",
  "governance-design",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.4156.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Responsible AI: A Practitioner Playbook for Trustworthy AI Governance",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6324138"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:4685567-023",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4685567-023",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Impact Investing Innovation - From Impact 1.0 to 3.0 (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4685567",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Impact Investing Innovation - From Impact 1.0 to 3.0",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2024",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=4685567",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "87fb1be89d2661967ed2b0b673fe26448ded3bc3119b122177a4fc13ae5c085c"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4685567-023"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Responsible AI: A Practitioner Playbook for Trustworthy AI Governance",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6324138"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7171",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7171.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:9f2b82a6c4905ff30709",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.4156,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, yet, abstract, compliance, not, practice. Scope: donor community does not pool assets or take custody; voting and staking outcomes are publicly visible.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.2139/ssrn.6324138",
  "queryId": "concept:b5ce5d92d4b5",
  "queryText": "AI agent governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6324138",
  "doi": "10.2139/ssrn.6324138",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.2139/ssrn.6324138",
   "Crossref": "10.2139/ssrn.6324138"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T20:33:40.714Z",
  "providerPage": 1,
  "rawObservationSha256": "79f5118a8f03e7c11aa012912d9b19c19d3ff795bb59606891f6f1fde6e649fe",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "95f3c3e1638ca36a1683b7a07036b5ed8191ad7a1549b24a5ebff941a468f5ce",
  "inputLine": 143,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00001",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.2139/ssrn.6324138",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Sukanya P"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2026-01-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.2139/ssrn.6324138",
   "crossref:10.2139/ssrn.6324138",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6324138",
   "title:c3d0c44531cac5cc5a92fd02",
   "proposition:029310638dcf4428522dc32621bf970e4bee515b6b8fe407a7f365351d3c9e04"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "AI adoption has accelerated sharply across organisations, yet most governance efforts remain abstract or compliance-driven and do not translate into engineering practice.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "f3d82e5fe21719f3f9f23ca74f185445a7d9f147e6a1d42ef86859e664ff4449",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 1,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:4685567-023",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4685567-023",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.4156,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, yet, abstract, compliance, not, practice. Scope: donor community does not pool assets or take custody; voting and staking outcomes are publicly visible.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2317580-019",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2317580-019",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.4051,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: responsible, has, abstract, compliance, not. Scope: regulated entities operating under a comprehensive CIA.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2922176-009",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2922176-009",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.4011,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, abstract, compliance, driven, practice. Scope: listed companies and their governance experts.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2317580-027",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2317580-027",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.3909,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, efforts, abstract, compliance, not. Scope: off-label marketing cases; boards subject to CIA certification requirements.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2998033-005",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2998033-005",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3881,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: across, yet, abstract, compliance, not. Scope: applies where consumer protection or data protection rules impose jurisdiction specific storage requirements.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008, SHA-256 469be3af77a43b8a86f52c2e8253882abdefc7a0da53c392329c3cb8a11e8160, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "4ad7bfa7ed15a1091ab642da6222fb0f54ec3e06827456e4a88040956251ea74"
}