kaal:position:2026-07-31-7198

AI as a socio-technical actor: rethinking definitions for ethics and governance presents the following source proposition: Yet, taken on their own, they remain normatively incomplete because they abstract AI systems from the social and institutional settings in which their effects materialize. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that The delayed voting outcomes and feedback effects created by the transition from loosely coupled to tightly coupled voting let DAOIC members triangulate their own internal liquidity position against deal feasibility. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.

• The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
• External evidence level: abstract indexed.
• Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.
• Primary mapping confidence: 0.4012.
• The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation.

AI as a socio-technical actor: rethinking definitions for ethics and governance

kaal:claim:3949098-011
Wulf A. Kaal, Reputation as Capital – How DAOs Upgrade Finance (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3949098
Source PDF sha256: 04297905564a6092b2db7640561f58fd374d3114c79527357bad09d11b909819

Evidence: abstract indexed
Review tier: moderate-confidence claim review
Mapping confidence: 0.4012
Mapping ambiguous: true

governance-designinstitutional-designdefihistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref

Affirmed in kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008 on 2026-07-31. Review record.

Canonical markdown sha256: 15f6a098156a61728eb9683bf04aef80b8f85a5b81ee7ce8e889fb88379e2670
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7198.md | sha256sum