kaal:position:2026-07-31-7199

Defining organizational AI governance presents the following source proposition: However, there have been few efforts to define AI governance thus far. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Put option based discount models for lack of marketability have been widely used, but they can be inaccurate because real investors do not possess perfect market timing ability. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.

• The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
• External evidence level: abstract indexed.
• Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.
• Primary mapping confidence: 0.4218.
• The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation.

Defining organizational AI governance

kaal:claim:4033886-023
Wulf A. Kaal, Samuel Evans, Hayley Howe, Digital Asset Valuation (2022). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4033886
Source PDF sha256: 52ba05b1292b1be4bfaf1ee5cf56b14fea9c196d870603e794d7ee316df129bd

Evidence: abstract indexed
Review tier: moderate-confidence claim review
Mapping confidence: 0.4218
Mapping ambiguous: true

economicsdefihistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref

Affirmed in kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008 on 2026-07-31. Review record.

Canonical markdown sha256: 078fa6cef1a8be3241c6d562df1d39f3cd5d6a68727be32f04ce45c0b51f2a6d
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7199.md | sha256sum