{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7205",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-7205",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Ai Risk Management A Law And Economics Perspective F3F72Ee7E6",
 "text": "AI risk management – A law and economics perspective presents the following source proposition: Article 9 of the EU AI Act exemplifies this challenge, as it relies on indeterminate terms, such as “reasonably foreseeable risks” and “acceptability of risk”, to define the scope of the provision. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that German commentators, whose expertise German courts rely on heavily, concluded after the financial crisis that managers do not act reasonably under the German business judgment rule if the risks they take on behalf of the corporation result in the demise of the corporation. The proposed response is a qualification: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "systemic-risk",
  "risk-and-incentives",
  "corporate-governance",
  "law-and-legal-systems",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.3504.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "AI risk management – A law and economics perspective",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.1017/cfl.2026.10042"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-013",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-013",
  "citation": "Kaal, A Comparative Perspective on the Limitations of the Duty of Oversight – A Comment on Lisa Fairfax (2013)",
  "paper": "Kaal, A Comparative Perspective on the Limitations of the Duty of Oversight – A Comment on Lisa Fairfax",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2013",
  "ssrn": null,
  "source_pdf_sha256": "ac5c955fe01209c54c78c4575c0b8bf570e5f1259c3f855510697cf51a32e59a"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-013"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "AI risk management – A law and economics perspective",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.1017/cfl.2026.10042"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7205",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7205.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:86a3c6d4775a6c6b77b8",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.3504,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: risk, law, perspective, act, terms, reasonably, risks. Scope: Germany; post financial crisis evaluation of liability rules.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.1017/cfl.2026.10042",
  "queryId": "concept:b5ce5d92d4b5",
  "queryText": "AI agent governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1017/cfl.2026.10042",
  "doi": "10.1017/cfl.2026.10042",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.1017/cfl.2026.10042",
   "Crossref": "10.1017/cfl.2026.10042"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T20:34:00.642Z",
  "providerPage": 3,
  "rawObservationSha256": "eaef87a80e586c52a0a2def9f1cf8129820be5a0590195d033e067c1b4bdf2a2",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "95f3c3e1638ca36a1683b7a07036b5ed8191ad7a1549b24a5ebff941a468f5ce",
  "inputLine": 593,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00003",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.1017/cfl.2026.10042",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Jan-Frederick Göhsl"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2026-01-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.1017/cfl.2026.10042",
   "crossref:10.1017/cfl.2026.10042",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.1017/cfl.2026.10042",
   "title:d3f9d2ad027637e36399e975",
   "proposition:c0f78f5d70c6625a8a080b885abd6e418b6865f180236ccf5e30d248cb620361"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Article 9 of the EU AI Act exemplifies this challenge, as it relies on indeterminate terms, such as “reasonably foreseeable risks” and “acceptability of risk”, to define the scope of the provision.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "5c84eab5ca2a5b5fdafea7e2347537ff6c9bb60e316a380f4f0499ffa4a91406",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 0,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-013",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-013",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.3504,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: risk, law, perspective, act, terms, reasonably, risks. Scope: Germany; post financial crisis evaluation of liability rules.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3405660-012",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3405660-012",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.335,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: risk, management, economics, risks. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2959730-028",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2959730-028",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3209,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: risk, economics, foreseeable. Scope: competitive pressure from smaller technology adopting managers.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2748096-020",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2748096-020",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.3187,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: risk, economics, such, risks. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3808852-024",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3808852-024",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3187,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: risk, economics, such, risks. Scope: applies to DEX where settlement is delivery versus payment directly between trading parties.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008, SHA-256 469be3af77a43b8a86f52c2e8253882abdefc7a0da53c392329c3cb8a11e8160, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "ec152f20a555dfbd0e46abff47e6db4f0ad2d31858e724ddf161f6aa3d437d8c"
}