Extension: AI Governance Frameworks for Financial Institutions: A U.S. Regulatory Perspective
AI Governance Frameworks for Financial Institutions: A U.S. Regulatory Perspective presents the following source proposition: For this purpose, this paper suggests a model for how financial organizations should govern those technologies. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Static regulatory frameworks calibrated to legislative timescales cannot govern technologies evolving on exponential timescales, so dynamic regulation that self-adjusts through built-in feedback mechanisms is a precondition for effective governance of the computative domain. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
dynamic-regulationgovernance-designhistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref