kaal:position:2026-07-31-7239

Stress-Testing UK AI Governance Under Early Phase Incident Uncertainty presents the following source proposition: While this architecture is designed to balance innovation and risk management, it has largely been developed under relatively stable conditions. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Regulatory timing under disruptive innovation is a two sided risk: regulate too early and innovation is inhibited, withhold regulation too long and consumers and markets are harmed once regulatory inertia has formed around the disruptive product or service. The proposed response is a qualification: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.

• The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
• External evidence level: abstract indexed.
• Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.
• Primary mapping confidence: 0.3712.
• The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation.

Stress-Testing UK AI Governance Under Early Phase Incident Uncertainty

kaal:claim:2740477-019
Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Venture Capital as Dynamic Regulation of Disruptive Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2740477
Source PDF sha256: c72871b76fa2ad5a8a69ee8d3defc8f64e624be9052ce763e79cf6c58883f726

Evidence: abstract indexed
Review tier: moderate-confidence claim review
Mapping confidence: 0.3712
Mapping ambiguous: true

innovationhistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref

Affirmed in kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008 on 2026-07-31. Review record.

Canonical markdown sha256: 061ecbe79dcd81bc4a68a1b77eae33266e3bee788cc2d3b86159fc05b4ff1c7d
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7239.md | sha256sum