{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7251",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-7251",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Operational Ai Governance And The Runtime Decision Ownership Gap Edb6A0Ec50",
 "text": "Operational AI Governance and the Runtime Decision Ownership Gap presents the following source proposition: Existing approaches emphasize model correctness, policy compliance, and system integrity, but provide limited visibility into how humans actually interact with AI at runtime. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that By prescribing the number of board meetings devoted to compliance review and requiring specific board resolutions, CIA provisions let the government contractually determine how and when a board will interact. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "corporate-governance",
  "systemic-risk",
  "compliance",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.3788.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Operational AI Governance and the Runtime Decision Ownership Gap",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6104126"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:2317580-020",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2317580-020",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Elizabeth R. Malay, The Role of Corporate Integrity Agreements in the Expansion of Fiduciary Duties (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2317580",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Elizabeth R. Malay, The Role of Corporate Integrity Agreements in the Expansion of Fiduciary Duties",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2013",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=2317580",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "50973e1e820aef47a4e7ffdbdcb513d03f1845643fcf4fa5910e9528a0b7dac2"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2317580-020"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Operational AI Governance and the Runtime Decision Ownership Gap",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6104126"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7251",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7251.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:db0840f7ebaee2697ddb",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.3788,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, compliance, integrity, interact. Scope: CIAs containing board specific provisions, as in the Allergan, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca agreements.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.2139/ssrn.6104126",
  "queryId": "concept:b5ce5d92d4b5",
  "queryText": "AI agent governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6104126",
  "doi": "10.2139/ssrn.6104126",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.2139/ssrn.6104126",
   "Crossref": "10.2139/ssrn.6104126"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T20:34:01.397Z",
  "providerPage": 5,
  "rawObservationSha256": "c05834a3e4fff2c8211917368d27cc196cd947e68c072f3dfe34cd24e1752f41",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "95f3c3e1638ca36a1683b7a07036b5ed8191ad7a1549b24a5ebff941a468f5ce",
  "inputLine": 1006,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00005",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.2139/ssrn.6104126",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Vivekanand Singh",
   "Shubham Yadav"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2026-01-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.2139/ssrn.6104126",
   "crossref:10.2139/ssrn.6104126",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6104126",
   "title:9e8adb396f842390f97c2d8d",
   "proposition:8f72cd377f220ea40d713baf49a7d5c34e72a176dcb31bf50f7db6428ca847e2"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Existing approaches emphasize model correctness, policy compliance, and system integrity, but provide limited visibility into how humans actually interact with AI at runtime.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "b40809b190400aed0e0b618f69b99ef1a112a935dc1e6d358f91b04b29709555",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 1,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2317580-020",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2317580-020",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.3788,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, compliance, integrity, interact. Scope: CIAs containing board specific provisions, as in the Allergan, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca agreements.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:4900880-037",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4900880-037",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3653,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: operational, governance, compliance, integrity. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2317580-005",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2317580-005",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3523,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, policy, compliance, integrity. Scope: a CIA has been executed; directors granted the government access, including site visits.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:1998455-016",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1998455-016",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.3366,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, decision, compliance, provide. Scope: theoretical possibility flagged by the author; presupposes CCS designs that appear protective.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2317580-027",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2317580-027",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3353,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, compliance, integrity, but. Scope: off-label marketing cases; boards subject to CIA certification requirements.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008, SHA-256 469be3af77a43b8a86f52c2e8253882abdefc7a0da53c392329c3cb8a11e8160, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "47f74bcfd447e6ea868a36d6d78a7a3a686a2d1902e179793cac8ae90abb2eec"
}