kaal:position:2026-07-31-7269

Experimentalism beyond ex ante regulation: A law and economics perspective on AI regulatory sandboxes presents the following source proposition: Traditional ex ante regulatory approaches struggle to keep pace with AI development, exacerbating the “pacing problem” and the Collingridge dilemma. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Hybrid approaches and meta structures that connect the existing legal and regulatory infrastructure with blockchain based smart contracting will accelerate rather than slow the bifurcation of the jurisdictional infrastructure into traditional and crypto prongs. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.

• The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
• External evidence level: abstract indexed.
• Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.
• Primary mapping confidence: 0.3621.
• The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation.

Experimentalism beyond ex ante regulation: A law and economics perspective on AI regulatory sandboxes

kaal:claim:2992962-022
Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962
Source PDF sha256: 80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17

Evidence: abstract indexed
Review tier: moderate-confidence claim review
Mapping confidence: 0.3621
Mapping ambiguous: true

economicslaw-and-legal-systemshistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref

Affirmed in kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008 on 2026-07-31. Review record.

Canonical markdown sha256: 1c19554efaa8e1f2114a9b6ac3532f1f74b4761cbd17d641e0ee580d3a5bcdfa
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7269.md | sha256sum