{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7276",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-7276",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Agentic Proxies Governance Accountability And The Architecture Of A Trus A0033Ce9D3",
 "text": "Agentic Proxies: Governance, Accountability, and the Architecture of a Trustworthy AI Economy presents the following source proposition: Existing governance frameworks-identity systems, observability platforms, compliance APIs-establish who an agent claims to be and what it did. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that WDAGs allow new regulatory and ethical standards to be integrated into existing AI systems without overhauling the entire model architecture, which is what makes rapid legal adaptation feasible in sectors such as public safety and healthcare. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "compliance",
  "ai-and-agents",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.35.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Agentic Proxies: Governance, Accountability, and the Architecture of a Trustworthy AI Economy",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6950742"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:4855607-024",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4855607-024",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, How AI Models are Optimized Through Web3 Governance (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4855607",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, How AI Models are Optimized Through Web3 Governance",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2024",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=4855607",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "eb0b3e62374b45a8fa888c6bde9725e606bcb46cf4b5e74a6e851d9f25099113"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4855607-024"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Agentic Proxies: Governance, Accountability, and the Architecture of a Trustworthy AI Economy",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6950742"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7276",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7276.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:cff5fd9e78be20f5c0c4",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.35,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, architecture, existing, compliance. Scope: sectors where AI applications must rapidly adapt to new laws and ethical considerations.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.2139/ssrn.6950742",
  "queryId": "concept:b5ce5d92d4b5",
  "queryText": "AI agent governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6950742",
  "doi": "10.2139/ssrn.6950742",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.2139/ssrn.6950742",
   "Crossref": "10.2139/ssrn.6950742"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T20:34:01.741Z",
  "providerPage": 6,
  "rawObservationSha256": "65c22f85134fa9174fd45676c62541a554cbacc6e696f3ed55bd0b4ad3da4e53",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "95f3c3e1638ca36a1683b7a07036b5ed8191ad7a1549b24a5ebff941a468f5ce",
  "inputLine": 1283,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00006",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.2139/ssrn.6950742",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Geoff Lundholm"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2026-01-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.2139/ssrn.6950742",
   "crossref:10.2139/ssrn.6950742",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6950742",
   "title:c8676c218f50ebaefad4de73",
   "proposition:789dce08386ee459acc1734dff8b5deaa59a90858b5e808dac4e546b1423e363"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Existing governance frameworks-identity systems, observability platforms, compliance APIs-establish who an agent claims to be and what it did.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "45adc2b8301a81dc8ed6116b3979aabd8cb00ab46d2ceff27c49cd837c9a076f",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 2,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:4855607-024",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4855607-024",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.35,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, architecture, existing, compliance. Scope: sectors where AI applications must rapidly adapt to new laws and ethical considerations.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3373393-003",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3373393-003",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3492,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, existing, compliance, agent. Scope: under the existing theoretical and legal framework for corporate governance.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5245185-019",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5245185-019",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3472,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: accountability, compliance, agent. Scope: proprietary internal monitoring by developers and owners.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5886442-018",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5886442-018",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.3289,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: economy, compliance, agent. Scope: assumes agents operate on attested, federated or otherwise verifiable substrates.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2317580-035",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2317580-035",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3285,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, compliance, claims. Scope: companies that executed a CIA or a comparable agreement such as a voluntary compliance plan.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008, SHA-256 469be3af77a43b8a86f52c2e8253882abdefc7a0da53c392329c3cb8a11e8160, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "983970ce680be1e0e97ede1ce710e2026aabbdaf135b912f5c0580d24dc2b2ae"
}