kaal:position:2026-07-31-7290

AI Disclosure Without Protection: A Governance Gap in Scholarly Peer Review presents the following source proposition: These policies rarely tell reviewers how to interpret that disclosure. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that The broad investment authority of unconstrained mutual fund managers exposes retail investors to fluid trading and investing patterns that the average retail investor is unlikely to sufficiently appreciate, regardless of the nature and quantum of disclosure, so additional disclosure cannot close the gap. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.

• The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
• External evidence level: abstract indexed.
• Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.
• Primary mapping confidence: 0.4326.
• The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation.

AI Disclosure Without Protection: A Governance Gap in Scholarly Peer Review

kaal:claim:2811729-031
Wulf A. Kaal, Unconstrained Mutual Funds and Retail Investor Protection (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2811729
Source PDF sha256: 0877b0a076f2614559cb0b1a736f73401cecbee7cfe014da6e36709208e92a74

Evidence: abstract indexed
Review tier: moderate-confidence claim review
Mapping confidence: 0.4326
Mapping ambiguous: true

disclosurehistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref

Affirmed in kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008 on 2026-07-31. Review record.

Canonical markdown sha256: 1f3f3cb2a0d3f7ce1360a9e69e09a98470b54b49abcb93c24a8295b27fc616a1
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7290.md | sha256sum