{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7293",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-7293",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Can Ai Governance Be Progressive Group Interests Group Privacy And Abnor 50C4C194Dc",
 "text": "Can AI governance be progressive? Group interests, group privacy and abnormal justice presents the following source proposition: This paper asks whether our current thin concept of responsibility can be made into a thicker one that takes in more than compliance with law and basic ethical principles. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Smart contracts can automate compliance with regulatory requirements and ethical guidelines: for example, a smart contract can enforce privacy law directly by controlling an AI system's access to personal data according to predefined rules. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "smart-contracts",
  "compliance",
  "consensus-and-security",
  "blockchain",
  "governance-design",
  "ai-and-agents",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.3529.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Can AI governance be progressive? Group interests, group privacy and abnormal justice",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/78mf3"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:4941807-019",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4941807-019",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, AI Governance Via Web3 Reputation System (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4941807",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, AI Governance Via Web3 Reputation System",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2024",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=4941807",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "ab66c1e99a88da1fa36b0c6b536df5184231fe6aa427f3dd53287a4e0ac79853"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4941807-019"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Can AI governance be progressive? Group interests, group privacy and abnormal justice",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/78mf3"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7293",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7293.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:114d215164e3a01102a3",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.3529,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, privacy, compliance, law, ethical. Scope: where compliance rules can be expressed as predefined, codified conditions.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.31235/osf.io/78mf3",
  "queryId": "concept:b5ce5d92d4b5",
  "queryText": "AI agent governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/78mf3",
  "doi": "10.31235/osf.io/78mf3",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.31235/osf.io/78mf3",
   "Crossref": "10.31235/osf.io/78mf3"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T20:34:01.741Z",
  "providerPage": 6,
  "rawObservationSha256": "c8353f04ee03d6772c471a75c57cb9fdc5f4f0213414436d32406ad2e018c58d",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "95f3c3e1638ca36a1683b7a07036b5ed8191ad7a1549b24a5ebff941a468f5ce",
  "inputLine": 1413,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00006",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.31235/osf.io/78mf3",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Linnet Taylor"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2022-05-24",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.31235/osf.io/78mf3",
   "crossref:10.31235/osf.io/78mf3",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/78mf3",
   "title:33fcf1484d80f4d9bd803f9b",
   "proposition:a9298e9a0a74900bf6e0bcddeeac75229a5f470cd125480f867bd39a833a94db"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "This paper asks whether our current thin concept of responsibility can be made into a thicker one that takes in more than compliance with law and basic ethical principles.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "e5e11f4dce53ecd7ef41ee05273ad7458e4e1fdb23e298d653d2ac1a2b94701b",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 0,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:4941807-019",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4941807-019",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.3529,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, privacy, compliance, law, ethical. Scope: where compliance rules can be expressed as predefined, codified conditions.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5554218-020",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5554218-020",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3483,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: justice, compliance, law, basic. Scope: automated on chain enforcement without human adjudication.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:4796714-015",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4796714-015",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3292,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, current, compliance, ethical. Scope: applies where a few dominant parties influence the underlying Layer 1; holds under current blockchain design as of 2024.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3266953-036",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3266953-036",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.3264,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: justice, takes, compliance. Scope: Semada DAO governance.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3981021-018",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3981021-018",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3216,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, one, takes, compliance. Scope: endowments transferred to a DAO with expert voting associates.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008, SHA-256 469be3af77a43b8a86f52c2e8253882abdefc7a0da53c392329c3cb8a11e8160, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "6901745ac597efe41b593b96770b089ffc05aa8ce5710ba8a4a397ac4ccb71d1"
}