{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7300",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-7300",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Role And Governance Of Artificial Intelligence In The Public Policy Cycl 93D5D45Fb0",
 "text": "Role and Governance of Artificial Intelligence in the Public Policy Cycle presents the following source proposition: Two main issues that have emerged are AI governance and the potential use of AI in the public policy cycle. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that AI models applied to the European Court of Human Rights have achieved 97% accuracy in predicting case outcomes under Article 6, which the authors treat as evidence of their potential as judicial decision support tools rather than as replacements for judges. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "institutional-design",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.3586.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Role and Governance of Artificial Intelligence in the Public Policy Cycle",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.25"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:5541658-005",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-005",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2025",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "e543a2d698fcd522d4d02e034cc9ee1344d0015d2c824b40b9e05ab7c0728c60"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-005"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Role and Governance of Artificial Intelligence in the Public Policy Cycle",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.25"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7300",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7300.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:871d85ebfbddf4c0f87e",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.3586,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: role, artificial, intelligence, have, potential. Scope: European Court of Human Rights; Article 6 cases; prediction against existing judgments.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.25",
  "queryId": "concept:b5ce5d92d4b5",
  "queryText": "AI agent governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.25",
  "doi": "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.25",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.25",
   "Crossref": "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.25"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T20:34:01.741Z",
  "providerPage": 6,
  "rawObservationSha256": "a79ebb08e2f22334a47cabcfa368eecf1ffabf39d4ba8cc93393d0ae0ca073b1",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "95f3c3e1638ca36a1683b7a07036b5ed8191ad7a1549b24a5ebff941a468f5ce",
  "inputLine": 1490,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00006",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.25",
  "workAuthors": [
   "David Valle-Cruz",
   "Rodrigo Sandoval-Almazán"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2022-08-18",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.25",
   "crossref:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.25",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.25",
   "title:bd789480f0bc2b60b6c7c9c7",
   "proposition:da114aa6cafd119b0cd8c1478fdda0b7aeaf9aeca61231a1af3ef19b6c38c8b3"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Two main issues that have emerged are AI governance and the potential use of AI in the public policy cycle.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "e378d4494432b5547a757d75200712481ab4c80d1ac7f501dd7667f4780301f7",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 0,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5541658-005",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-005",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.3586,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: role, artificial, intelligence, have, potential. Scope: European Court of Human Rights; Article 6 cases; prediction against existing judgments.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5541658-029",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-029",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3482,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: role, artificial, intelligence, public, have. Scope: the existing empirical literature on AI in judicial systems.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5541658-024",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-024",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3187,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: role, artificial, intelligence, potential. Scope: European Union; AI systems used in judicial proceedings including predictive analytics and judicial decision support.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5541658-004",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-004",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.3167,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: role, artificial, intelligence, two. Scope: the 2010s wave of deep learning tools in legal practice.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5541658-026",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-026",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3167,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: role, artificial, intelligence, two. Scope: comparative regulation of AI in legal and judicial settings.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008, SHA-256 469be3af77a43b8a86f52c2e8253882abdefc7a0da53c392329c3cb8a11e8160, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "fe845ee37979a923ed516e462d2c5d923b44e464477821b013cc51cbb38c5c78"
}