{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7301",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-7301",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Role And Governance Of Artificial Intelligence In The Public Policy Cycl Dbdfc570Be",
 "text": "Role and Governance of Artificial Intelligence in the Public Policy Cycle presents the following source proposition: AI techniques can improve the quality and efficiency of government decision-making by altering the perspective of public administration. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that The literature offers high short term accuracy figures for judicial AI but almost no evidence on how these tools affect decision quality, case backlogs, or public trust over extended periods, which is a fundamental research gap. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "reputation",
  "economics",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.4207.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Role and Governance of Artificial Intelligence in the Public Policy Cycle",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.25"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:5541658-029",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-029",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2025",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "e543a2d698fcd522d4d02e034cc9ee1344d0015d2c824b40b9e05ab7c0728c60"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-029"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Role and Governance of Artificial Intelligence in the Public Policy Cycle",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.25"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7301",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7301.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:e292bd8e0d54c4a8b7a0",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.4207,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: role, artificial, intelligence, public, quality, decision, making. Scope: the existing empirical literature on AI in judicial systems.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.25",
  "queryId": "concept:b5ce5d92d4b5",
  "queryText": "AI agent governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.25",
  "doi": "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.25",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.25",
   "Crossref": "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.25"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T20:34:01.741Z",
  "providerPage": 6,
  "rawObservationSha256": "a79ebb08e2f22334a47cabcfa368eecf1ffabf39d4ba8cc93393d0ae0ca073b1",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "95f3c3e1638ca36a1683b7a07036b5ed8191ad7a1549b24a5ebff941a468f5ce",
  "inputLine": 1490,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00006",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.25",
  "workAuthors": [
   "David Valle-Cruz",
   "Rodrigo Sandoval-Almazán"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2022-08-18",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.25",
   "crossref:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.25",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197579329.013.25",
   "title:bd789480f0bc2b60b6c7c9c7",
   "proposition:2bd64eb62eeb185d6b4a1e575a3617fab0025d4468a83e069c1084a2b5bde331"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "AI techniques can improve the quality and efficiency of government decision-making by altering the perspective of public administration.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "e5961e99d19d903292bf55c6246f5bfff0339437ca381bff5bd14ca815bd23a7",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 1,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5541658-029",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-029",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.4207,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: role, artificial, intelligence, public, quality, decision, making. Scope: the existing empirical literature on AI in judicial systems.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5541658-012",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-012",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3004,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: role, artificial, intelligence, techniques. Scope: post hoc explainable AI methods such as the SHAP family of explainers.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5541658-036",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-036",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.2735,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: role, artificial, intelligence, efficiency. Scope: integration of AI into legal systems generally.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5541658-005",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-005",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.2684,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: role, artificial, intelligence, decision. Scope: European Court of Human Rights; Article 6 cases; prediction against existing judgments.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5541658-032",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-032",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.2639,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: role, artificial, intelligence, making. Scope: closed source LLMs evaluated on public benchmarks.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008, SHA-256 469be3af77a43b8a86f52c2e8253882abdefc7a0da53c392329c3cb8a11e8160, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "c2c077e2eefa7ac518a52608e35ca938020633c84ea411313ff45b4f6aedcd93"
}