{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7343",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-7343",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Epistemic Extraction In Ai Governance Institutional Design And Participa 63E0Ff67Bf",
 "text": "Epistemic Extraction in AI Governance: Institutional Design and Participation in the Global South presents the following source proposition: Participation is therefore not neutral inclusion but conditional recognition. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that The on-chain reputation score becomes a universal, jurisdiction-neutral credential for digital-law expertise, analogous to a dynamically updated h-index for legal scholarship but cryptographically verifiable and immune to institutional capture. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "regulatory-failure",
  "institutional-design",
  "law-and-legal-systems",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.4708.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Epistemic Extraction in AI Governance: Institutional Design and Participation in the Global South",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6835741"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:5887242-026",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5887242-026",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, The UDLC DAO Operationalizing a Continuously Evolving Universal Digital Law Codex Through Weighted (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5887242",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, The UDLC DAO Operationalizing a Continuously Evolving Universal Digital Law Codex Through Weighted",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2025",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=5887242",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "4e5c2e2b4304af6d22e0b0939b1fddeabcf091e19a1b00b7bfccf77cbd6280c5"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5887242-026"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Epistemic Extraction in AI Governance: Institutional Design and Participation in the Global South",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6835741"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7343",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7343.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:5cf973fad4b99a779d2d",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.4708,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: institutional, design, global, neutral, but. Scope: review source claim scope.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.2139/ssrn.6835741",
  "queryId": "concept:b5ce5d92d4b5",
  "queryText": "AI agent governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6835741",
  "doi": "10.2139/ssrn.6835741",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.2139/ssrn.6835741",
   "Crossref": "10.2139/ssrn.6835741"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T20:34:02.798Z",
  "providerPage": 8,
  "rawObservationSha256": "e406d24f61f46319aba3070b69c2c9f4e5bdd47f9480623dd240e71e1699bbdb",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "95f3c3e1638ca36a1683b7a07036b5ed8191ad7a1549b24a5ebff941a468f5ce",
  "inputLine": 1870,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00008",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.2139/ssrn.6835741",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Harminder Pal Monga"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2026-01-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.2139/ssrn.6835741",
   "crossref:10.2139/ssrn.6835741",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6835741",
   "title:fb0b96ad3069fc527f091008",
   "proposition:af1fab148b03666511317a7a6f2399dc330466d00dcc51c6d664d49b3773cb82"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Participation is therefore not neutral inclusion but conditional recognition.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "ab1765b2c31746eec0faacda0b981b2f5ecf8e58d8f5dc661600dafbb29e8269",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 1,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5887242-026",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5887242-026",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.4708,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: institutional, design, global, neutral, but. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3962614-041",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3962614-041",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.4079,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: institutional, design, participation, not, but. Scope: DAO investment club phases where the public market funds deals.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2061166-006",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2061166-006",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.4078,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: institutional, design, therefore, recognition. Scope: countercyclical buffers up to the 2.5 percent mutual recognition ceiling; institutions with branches or subsidiaries in the buffer-setting Member State.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3981021-036",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3981021-036",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.3942,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, institutional, design, inclusion. Scope: governance designs using pseudonymous reputation rather than legacy identifiers.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3125822-009",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3125822-009",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3933,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: institutional, design, not, conditional. Scope: core imposes no smart contracting language; depends on expert policing of non compliant contracts.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008, SHA-256 469be3af77a43b8a86f52c2e8253882abdefc7a0da53c392329c3cb8a11e8160, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "c608e85d2d21b50239ebe324620b9ab5a853a72ae32f0f3dab6c9572655c31f9"
}