{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7345",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-7345",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Beyond Technical Compliance Iii From Designed Fragilities To Cooperative 71B913302C",
 "text": "Beyond Technical Compliance III: From Designed Fragilities to Cooperative AI-Whose Intentions, Whose Governance? presents the following source proposition: Current AI governance operates within a paradigm that treats system design as a technical challenge requiring technical solutions. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Although CIAs are not laws, they go beyond aspirational governance standards because they set forth concrete governance rules that more clearly define the duties to be informed, to exercise oversight, and to maintain effective reporting systems, thereby requiring a higher standard of care. The proposed response is a qualification: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "governance-design",
  "corporate-governance",
  "compliance",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.3814.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Beyond Technical Compliance III: From Designed Fragilities to Cooperative AI-Whose Intentions, Whose Governance?",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6513678"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:2317580-024",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2317580-024",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Elizabeth R. Malay, The Role of Corporate Integrity Agreements in the Expansion of Fiduciary Duties (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2317580",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Elizabeth R. Malay, The Role of Corporate Integrity Agreements in the Expansion of Fiduciary Duties",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2013",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=2317580",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "50973e1e820aef47a4e7ffdbdcb513d03f1845643fcf4fa5910e9528a0b7dac2"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2317580-024"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Beyond Technical Compliance III: From Designed Fragilities to Cooperative AI-Whose Intentions, Whose Governance?",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6513678"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7345",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7345.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:24ba119a9d7c4f99e3d2",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.3814,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: beyond, compliance, governance, design, requiring. Scope: directors of companies operating under a CIA.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.2139/ssrn.6513678",
  "queryId": "concept:b5ce5d92d4b5",
  "queryText": "AI agent governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6513678",
  "doi": "10.2139/ssrn.6513678",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.2139/ssrn.6513678",
   "Crossref": "10.2139/ssrn.6513678"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T20:34:02.798Z",
  "providerPage": 8,
  "rawObservationSha256": "83d5661a6c78721aaabca359325e904f3c221953ab8c591e4139073e0b219196",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "95f3c3e1638ca36a1683b7a07036b5ed8191ad7a1549b24a5ebff941a468f5ce",
  "inputLine": 1886,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00008",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.2139/ssrn.6513678",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Tomoko Mitsuoka"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2026-01-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.2139/ssrn.6513678",
   "crossref:10.2139/ssrn.6513678",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6513678",
   "title:0f4417956b30620196572876",
   "proposition:f25b2a1f22721e0aa4ed807ce234c6472a86bf9622c8ba56df84e8371d9acc0c"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Current AI governance operates within a paradigm that treats system design as a technical challenge requiring technical solutions.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "c19bbba05505fe70bdfcdb8057ee27f34f45968e12d3fde0601bd9a7b86a1245",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 0,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2317580-024",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2317580-024",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.3814,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: beyond, compliance, governance, design, requiring. Scope: directors of companies operating under a CIA.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:1806252-033",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1806252-033",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3396,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: compliance, iii, requiring. Scope: PFIARA requires written compliance policies just after Dodd-Frank changed the underlying law.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2317580-032",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2317580-032",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3326,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: compliance, governance, operates, design. Scope: companies operating under a CIA.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2486570-017",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2486570-017",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.3245,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: compliance, governance, design, requiring. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3128900-037",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3128900-037",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3214,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: compliance, designed, governance, design. Scope: after the system reaches maturity.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008, SHA-256 469be3af77a43b8a86f52c2e8253882abdefc7a0da53c392329c3cb8a11e8160, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "d5ab8823e574203fe838864f5705bb015b33928db3a2979b473149538c8cf372"
}