{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7346",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-7346",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Beyond Technical Compliance Iii From Designed Fragilities To Cooperative B3700D333E",
 "text": "Beyond Technical Compliance III: From Designed Fragilities to Cooperative AI-Whose Intentions, Whose Governance? presents the following source proposition: If the failures documented in the companion papers are designed, the question becomes: what should be designed instead-and by whom, with what intentions? This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Banks' role in monitoring hedge funds is not easily comparable to the principal agent problem between securities buyers and credit rating agencies, because banks have more influence over hedge funds than securities buyers have over rating agencies and their ratings. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "ai-and-agents",
  "corporate-governance",
  "systemic-risk",
  "compliance",
  "risk-and-incentives",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.3871.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Beyond Technical Compliance III: From Designed Fragilities to Cooperative AI-Whose Intentions, Whose Governance?",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6513678"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:1806252-031",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1806252-031",
  "citation": "Kaal, Hedge Fund Regulation Via Basel III (2011). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1806252",
  "paper": "Kaal, Hedge Fund Regulation Via Basel III",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2011",
  "ssrn": null,
  "source_pdf_sha256": "3343ebfe05a925c3d1a75625c4b351ccff515c50819a48d155804daacf01429d"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1806252-031"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Beyond Technical Compliance III: From Designed Fragilities to Cooperative AI-Whose Intentions, Whose Governance?",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6513678"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7346",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7346.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:4fd90632a992f3eebe8f",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.3871,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: compliance, iii, governance, papers. Scope: review source claim scope.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.2139/ssrn.6513678",
  "queryId": "concept:b5ce5d92d4b5",
  "queryText": "AI agent governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6513678",
  "doi": "10.2139/ssrn.6513678",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.2139/ssrn.6513678",
   "Crossref": "10.2139/ssrn.6513678"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T20:34:02.798Z",
  "providerPage": 8,
  "rawObservationSha256": "83d5661a6c78721aaabca359325e904f3c221953ab8c591e4139073e0b219196",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "95f3c3e1638ca36a1683b7a07036b5ed8191ad7a1549b24a5ebff941a468f5ce",
  "inputLine": 1886,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00008",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.2139/ssrn.6513678",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Tomoko Mitsuoka"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2026-01-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.2139/ssrn.6513678",
   "crossref:10.2139/ssrn.6513678",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6513678",
   "title:0f4417956b30620196572876",
   "proposition:37d60d190d041c799154438c67238c24a25766a55386af77ad4529815af44a7d"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "If the failures documented in the companion papers are designed, the question becomes: what should be designed instead-and by whom, with what intentions?",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "ec708f93eccb40c44ba988b89dd14beb8430a6d5b81961c1260923af12287dde",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 1,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:1806252-031",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1806252-031",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.3871,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: compliance, iii, governance, papers. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:1806252-008",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1806252-008",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3602,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: compliance, iii, papers. Scope: regulators are given a systemic risk mandate they lack capacity to execute.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:1806252-011",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1806252-011",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3602,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: compliance, iii, papers. Scope: the bank has an ongoing lending relationship with the fund.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:1806252-013",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1806252-013",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.3602,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: compliance, iii, papers. Scope: governments are presumed willing to bail out banks.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:1806252-028",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1806252-028",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3602,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: compliance, iii, papers. Scope: a hedge fund borrows from more than one bank, so no single bank sees its overall risk exposure.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008, SHA-256 469be3af77a43b8a86f52c2e8253882abdefc7a0da53c392329c3cb8a11e8160, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "f2405e7bd6dddd094534351481f0166037a990948322c95eeab78b08fce0740b"
}