{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7351",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-7351",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming From Ai Governance Structures To Risk Exposure Regimes A Configurational 24C0Ff3Be2",
 "text": "From AI Governance Structures to Risk Exposure Regimes: A Configurational Model of Organisational Vulnerability presents the following source proposition: This paper challenges that assumption, arguing that governance design plays a more critical role in determining AI-related risk than technological complexity. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Even though the creator of a DEX plays a limited role in its evolution, the code that provides the exchange's operational rules may still be subject to the centralized control of certain developers, and a completely open source DEX with no ongoing developer involvement remains untested. The proposed response is a qualification: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "open-source-and-code",
  "governance-design",
  "risk-and-incentives",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.3987.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "From AI Governance Structures to Risk Exposure Regimes: A Configurational Model of Organisational Vulnerability",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6706319"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:3808852-027",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3808852-027",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralization and Feedback Effects (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3808852",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralization and Feedback Effects",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2021",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=3808852",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "31e91158fdeefebc2f0be54ebf89751f7cdd4c89ecea932888f5ba9be6b1caba"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3808852-027"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "From AI Governance Structures to Risk Exposure Regimes: A Configurational Model of Organisational Vulnerability",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6706319"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7351",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7351.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:ddb81a951dbadf402ffd",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.3987,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, risk, design, plays, role. Scope: review source claim scope.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.2139/ssrn.6706319",
  "queryId": "concept:b5ce5d92d4b5",
  "queryText": "AI agent governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6706319",
  "doi": "10.2139/ssrn.6706319",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.2139/ssrn.6706319",
   "Crossref": "10.2139/ssrn.6706319"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T20:34:02.798Z",
  "providerPage": 8,
  "rawObservationSha256": "1c6a4c213e50957d47eb621a40db06462fb5259f52be98e187bb27de0d5b4508",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "95f3c3e1638ca36a1683b7a07036b5ed8191ad7a1549b24a5ebff941a468f5ce",
  "inputLine": 1964,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00008",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.2139/ssrn.6706319",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Victor Frimpong"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2026-01-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.2139/ssrn.6706319",
   "crossref:10.2139/ssrn.6706319",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6706319",
   "title:e310d8e5398a682a7859ceed",
   "proposition:422e0ce3aea3ab1f61b213fb4290f75c8bbc9406edab329e9744325012d1f8d0"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "This paper challenges that assumption, arguing that governance design plays a more critical role in determining AI-related risk than technological complexity.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "4219641c34ff203ca615f4064f0cfcca5d25e2b61454a85170e5a0bff2e8bc56",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 2,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3808852-027",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3808852-027",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.3987,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, risk, design, plays, role. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:4855607-033",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4855607-033",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3874,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, risk, vulnerability, challenges, design. Scope: RLHF systems where feedback providers have divergent stakes.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2922176-021",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2922176-021",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3665,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, structures, design, more, technological. Scope: as of 2017.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-010",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-010",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.352,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, risk, exposure, design, more. Scope: directors depend on counsel for fiduciary duty guidance.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5541658-028",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-028",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3427,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, challenges, design, role. Scope: governance of AI where jurisdictional variability and implementation gaps defeat conventional regulation.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008, SHA-256 469be3af77a43b8a86f52c2e8253882abdefc7a0da53c392329c3cb8a11e8160, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "035d4c7fd6fb874124c8662d979b2ba9db57d23b7751299160944fb1b7d9ba7a"
}