Extension: The Artificial Intelligence(AI) Enabled Governance Framework for NIRF Ranking Improvement of Higher Education Institutions
The Artificial Intelligence(AI) Enabled Governance Framework for NIRF Ranking Improvement of Higher Education Institutions presents the following source proposition: Achieving sustained improvement in NIRF rankings requires continuous excellence across teaching, research, student outcomes, inclusivity, and institutional reputation. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that A single reputation score, as used by DcentAI, cannot capture the interdependencies among privacy concerns, domain-specific regulation, and real-time ethical updates that dataset governance requires. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
reputationgovernance-designempirical-evidencehistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref