{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7358",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-7358",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming When Agents Cannot Be Benchmarked Ai Capability Opacity Corporate Govern Baed43D74F",
 "text": "When Agents Cannot Be Benchmarked: AI Capability Opacity, Corporate Governance, and a Research Agenda * presents the following source proposition: Principals matched with the more capable agent earned $2.68 more per deal as sellers and paid $2.45 less as buyers; the principals on the losing side did not detect the loss. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Banks' role in monitoring hedge funds is not easily comparable to the principal agent problem between securities buyers and credit rating agencies, because banks have more influence over hedge funds than securities buyers have over rating agencies and their ratings. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "ai-and-agents",
  "corporate-governance",
  "systemic-risk",
  "compliance",
  "risk-and-incentives",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.3961.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "When Agents Cannot Be Benchmarked: AI Capability Opacity, Corporate Governance, and a Research Agenda *",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6655439"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:1806252-031",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1806252-031",
  "citation": "Kaal, Hedge Fund Regulation Via Basel III (2011). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1806252",
  "paper": "Kaal, Hedge Fund Regulation Via Basel III",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2011",
  "ssrn": null,
  "source_pdf_sha256": "3343ebfe05a925c3d1a75625c4b351ccff515c50819a48d155804daacf01429d"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1806252-031"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "When Agents Cannot Be Benchmarked: AI Capability Opacity, Corporate Governance, and a Research Agenda *",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6655439"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7358",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7358.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:02fc1e51309a8d09e0e3",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.3961,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: agents, corporate, governance, more, agent, buyers, not. Scope: review source claim scope.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.2139/ssrn.6655439",
  "queryId": "concept:b5ce5d92d4b5",
  "queryText": "AI agent governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6655439",
  "doi": "10.2139/ssrn.6655439",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.2139/ssrn.6655439",
   "Crossref": "10.2139/ssrn.6655439"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T20:34:03.188Z",
  "providerPage": 9,
  "rawObservationSha256": "969786bad5a6dbaad993d2977114065acdefd86338aad08979668c3007ed48d9",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "95f3c3e1638ca36a1683b7a07036b5ed8191ad7a1549b24a5ebff941a468f5ce",
  "inputLine": 2006,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00009",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.2139/ssrn.6655439",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Phuc Nguyen"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2026-01-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.2139/ssrn.6655439",
   "crossref:10.2139/ssrn.6655439",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6655439",
   "title:a933e2d202deae90eb19446f",
   "proposition:9b51f3d10909e3c0d2416af5013f5e1378e1cea1be333f61dd0d8308d1888984"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Principals matched with the more capable agent earned $2.68 more per deal as sellers and paid $2.45 less as buyers; the principals on the losing side did not detect the loss.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "3bae8aaf553b2016c289f01808b1f70a1047414d4b4d3d275d8e352eaef02655",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 1,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:1806252-031",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1806252-031",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.3961,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: agents, corporate, governance, more, agent, buyers, not. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3373393-003",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3373393-003",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3686,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: agents, cannot, corporate, governance, principals, agent. Scope: under the existing theoretical and legal framework for corporate governance.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3782193-030",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782193-030",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3568,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: agents, cannot, corporate, governance, principals, not. Scope: Maghribi Jewish traders around 1000 AD under the Fatimid caliphate.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3782193-031",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782193-031",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.3524,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: agents, corporate, governance, agent, did, not. Scope: anonymous contracting; no effect of the outcome on future business.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3373393-009",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3373393-009",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3513,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: agents, corporate, governance, principals, loss. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008, SHA-256 469be3af77a43b8a86f52c2e8253882abdefc7a0da53c392329c3cb8a11e8160, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "fa6114c5753bbf3eecf9ea4ab76733e53536a560b9b9febbab3ad696bf613b28"
}