{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7363",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-7363",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming The Evidence Safety Gap In Cryptographic Agent Governance Compliance Com Cadc6B29Df",
 "text": "The Evidence-Safety Gap in Cryptographic Agent Governance: Compliance-Complete Failures and the Limits of Receipt-Based Accountability presents the following source proposition: Cryptographic agent governance systems use signed identities, delegated authority, policy decisions, and execution receipts to make autonomous AI agent actions auditable. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Penalty enforcement in SPoS achieves a false-positive rate below 10^-6 because ECDSA-signed attestations make validator actions non-repudiable and forging them computationally infeasible. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "compliance",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.3962.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "The Evidence-Safety Gap in Cryptographic Agent Governance: Compliance-Complete Failures and the Limits of Receipt-Based Accountability",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6684401"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:5225296-023",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5225296-023",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Cryptographic Foundations and Interdisciplinary Dimensions of the Secure Proof of Stake (SPoS) Conse (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5225296",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Cryptographic Foundations and Interdisciplinary Dimensions of the Secure Proof of Stake (SPoS) Conse",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2025",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=5225296",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "b2fec675d906334ad67e13b2d97261dc31e38061022867eb3f9ceadd95f4878d"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5225296-023"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "The Evidence-Safety Gap in Cryptographic Agent Governance: Compliance-Complete Failures and the Limits of Receipt-Based Accountability",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6684401"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7363",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7363.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:6a1eb0c9cc465f0c35b8",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.3962,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: cryptographic, compliance, signed, make, actions. Scope: review source claim scope.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.2139/ssrn.6684401",
  "queryId": "concept:b5ce5d92d4b5",
  "queryText": "AI agent governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6684401",
  "doi": "10.2139/ssrn.6684401",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.2139/ssrn.6684401",
   "Crossref": "10.2139/ssrn.6684401"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T20:34:03.188Z",
  "providerPage": 9,
  "rawObservationSha256": "f2666c7510dd550bcf4499f2635bd85a32726455fc58abc92697f9eb36f128ae",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "95f3c3e1638ca36a1683b7a07036b5ed8191ad7a1549b24a5ebff941a468f5ce",
  "inputLine": 2038,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00009",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.2139/ssrn.6684401",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Tymofii Pidlisnyi"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2026-01-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.2139/ssrn.6684401",
   "crossref:10.2139/ssrn.6684401",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6684401",
   "title:a61ad6091727f170df61574c",
   "proposition:bc994ba752a643a2141ba954a6ce51b72e2bdf961500c34e690994d4e2b38650"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "Cryptographic agent governance systems use signed identities, delegated authority, policy decisions, and execution receipts to make autonomous AI agent actions auditable.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "28159255e53dab193c628a4fcffc62a9eca0b6eb52d93fbae97aea07f928ea14",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 0,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5225296-023",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5225296-023",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.3962,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: cryptographic, compliance, signed, make, actions. Scope: review source claim scope.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3981021-015",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3981021-015",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3754,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: governance, compliance, decisions, autonomous, auditable. Scope: CHARITYxDAO using DLT and layer 2 solutions.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5225296-033",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5225296-033",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3734,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: evidence, cryptographic, governance, compliance, auditable. Scope: reputation must be openly auditable.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5886442-018",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5886442-018",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.3475,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: agent, compliance, autonomous, auditable. Scope: assumes agents operate on attested, federated or otherwise verifiable substrates.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5245185-039",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5245185-039",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3427,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: agent, governance, compliance, execution, make. Scope: monitoring of AI agent transaction execution in modern digital infrastructures.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008, SHA-256 469be3af77a43b8a86f52c2e8253882abdefc7a0da53c392329c3cb8a11e8160, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "7600f86251a4f1bfb88bf484d059454ed51c451ba526ce680a75cf799158834d"
}