kaal:position:2026-07-31-7372

Governance and compliance frameworks for responsible artificial intelligence deployment presents the following source proposition: In other words, they need to answer two vital questions: who governs who? This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Proposed regulatory remedies such as mandatory bias audits fail in practice because they lack clear implementation guidelines, which hinders their practical adoption. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.

• The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
• External evidence level: abstract indexed.
• Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.
• Primary mapping confidence: 0.5306.
• The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation.

Governance and compliance frameworks for responsible artificial intelligence deployment

kaal:claim:5541658-027
Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658
Source PDF sha256: e543a2d698fcd522d4d02e034cc9ee1344d0015d2c824b40b9e05ab7c0728c60

Evidence: abstract indexed
Review tier: moderate-confidence claim review
Mapping confidence: 0.5306
Mapping ambiguous: true

compliancehistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref

Affirmed in kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008 on 2026-07-31. Review record.

Canonical markdown sha256: 85d5e5e8e0914fb007cc814c0410d7699faec7a2cc8cc4fb344df1f6fba74da5
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7372.md | sha256sum