kaal:position:2026-07-31-7380
AI as Governance: Platformisation, State Capacity, and Algorithmic Authority in China’s Basic Education presents the following source proposition: This article conceptualises artificial intelligence (AI) as a governance regime embedded in platform infrastructures, data architectures, and state rationalities, rather than as a pedagogical or technical innovation. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Law schools that invest early in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and blockchain will gain a comparative advantage over peer schools irrespective of ranking, because demand for lawyers trained in those technologies is likely to spike once law firm adoption crosses a threshold. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
law-and-legal-systemseducation-and-practiceinnovationblockchainhistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref