kaal:position:2026-07-31-7391

From Ideal to Non-Ideal AI Ethics: Towards Adaptive Governance Through Checks and Balances presents the following source proposition: This risks a detachment between principles and practice, resulting in vague guidance and limited compliance. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that The removal of checks and balances, agent monitoring, audit requirements, disclosure regimes, market pressure, and executive compensation schemes produces a qualitative shift in efficiency in the agency relationship and in corporate governance overall. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.

Affirmed commentary position. This record extends a source-bound scholarly claim but is not a verbatim paper claim.
Holds when
Current debate

From Ideal to Non-Ideal AI Ethics: Towards Adaptive Governance Through Checks and Balances

Scholarly basis

kaal:claim:3373393-027
Wulf A. Kaal, Blockchain Solutions for Agency Problems in Corporate Governance (2019). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3373393
Source PDF sha256: 4d1424b9ba9aff8a61bc7a0dddd02cded93785e5843685dde76c07dcdb23961e

Evidence and mapping

Evidence: abstract indexed
Review tier: moderate-confidence claim review
Mapping confidence: 0.4065
Mapping ambiguous: true

Topics

blockchaineconomicscompliancedisclosuregovernance-designcorporate-governancehistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref

Provenance

Affirmed in kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008 on 2026-07-31. Review record.

Verify

Canonical markdown sha256: 7d0fee971f3577df2ec4d06af74f8cc0c9bf0eaa9cbe88670e32a1688230b52d
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7391.md | sha256sum