kaal:position:2026-07-31-7391
From Ideal to Non-Ideal AI Ethics: Towards Adaptive Governance Through Checks and Balances presents the following source proposition: This risks a detachment between principles and practice, resulting in vague guidance and limited compliance. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that The removal of checks and balances, agent monitoring, audit requirements, disclosure regimes, market pressure, and executive compensation schemes produces a qualitative shift in efficiency in the agency relationship and in corporate governance overall. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
blockchaineconomicscompliancedisclosuregovernance-designcorporate-governancehistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref