kaal:position:2026-07-31-7397

Ethical AI governance: AI for society and a co-learning approach presents the following source proposition: It critiques governance models, particularly rule-based approaches in the West, which, whilst addressing some risks, often stifle innovation and fail to engage diverse societal needs. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Allowing jurisdictions to tailor smart contract requirements to local statutory frameworks while adhering to a baseline of ethical principles preserves the innovative potential of blockchain by avoiding the homogenizing effects of harmonized legal standards. The proposed response is a qualification: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.

• The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
• External evidence level: abstract indexed.
• Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.
• Primary mapping confidence: 0.3896.
• The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation.

Ethical AI governance: AI for society and a co-learning approach

kaal:claim:5554218-036
Furrer Andreas, Wulf A. Kaal, Universal Digital Law Codex (UDLC) Building the Legal Infrastructure for the Digital Era (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5554218
Source PDF sha256: 55738b4035a91b70aa2ddaa127552fe4b373ec641afee2719fbdcabebdcbea44

Evidence: abstract indexed
Review tier: moderate-confidence claim review
Mapping confidence: 0.3896
Mapping ambiguous: true

law-and-legal-systemsgovernance-designinnovationhistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref

Affirmed in kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008 on 2026-07-31. Review record.

Canonical markdown sha256: 24caf1e26f1f0fc59b3217f23b85b01fb2a45a9ef659d17382951f735e17b409
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7397.md | sha256sum