kaal:position:2026-07-31-7399
How Do AI Companies “Fine-Tune” Policy? Examining Regulatory Capture in AI Governance presents the following source proposition: Capture of AI policy by AI developers and deployers could hinder such regulatory goals as ensuring the safety, fairness, beneficence, transparency, or innovation of general-purpose AI systems. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that When disruptive firms do not comply with existing rules or write their own exemptions because no appropriate rules exist, consumer protection and public safety goals are undermined and incumbent firms still bound by the rules suffer severe competitive disadvantages. The proposed response is a qualification: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
regulatory-failureinnovationhistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref