kaal:position:2026-07-31-7400

Who Is Accountable? When AI Makes the Wrong Decision? Rethinking Corporate Governance presents the following source proposition: <p>Corporate boards now sit atop decision architectures that no longer belong to them alone. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Although CIAs sit outside the formal legal framework that defines fiduciary duties, they belong to the penumbra of extra legal forces that clarifies what is expected of directors. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.

• The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
• External evidence level: abstract indexed.
• Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.
• Primary mapping confidence: 0.4417.
• The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation.

Who Is Accountable? When AI Makes the Wrong Decision? Rethinking Corporate Governance

kaal:claim:2317580-006
Wulf A. Kaal, Elizabeth R. Malay, The Role of Corporate Integrity Agreements in the Expansion of Fiduciary Duties (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2317580
Source PDF sha256: 50973e1e820aef47a4e7ffdbdcb513d03f1845643fcf4fa5910e9528a0b7dac2

Evidence: abstract indexed
Review tier: moderate-confidence claim review
Mapping confidence: 0.4417
Mapping ambiguous: true

law-and-legal-systemsgovernance-designcorporate-governancehistorical-responsescholarly-literaturecrossref

Affirmed in kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008 on 2026-07-31. Review record.

Canonical markdown sha256: 78703a0856dce1413a1491571ec2ae89a95f32ddffe23dbefe9ce9e14051e112
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7400.md | sha256sum