{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7401",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-7401",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Who Is Accountable When Ai Makes The Wrong Decision Rethinking Corporate 3D89459D05",
 "text": "Who Is Accountable? When AI Makes the Wrong Decision? Rethinking Corporate Governance presents the following source proposition: When one of these systems produces a harmful, discriminatory, or commercially damaging outcome, existing governance doctrine struggles to identify who answers for it. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that The traditional fiduciary duty doctrine is one of the most amorphous concepts in the law, and its indeterminacy produces confusion, inconsistency, and cases with problematic outcomes. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "corporate-governance",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.4097.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Who Is Accountable? When AI Makes the Wrong Decision? Rethinking Corporate Governance",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.19085/sijbpg130201"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:2317580-001",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2317580-001",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Elizabeth R. Malay, The Role of Corporate Integrity Agreements in the Expansion of Fiduciary Duties (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2317580",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Elizabeth R. Malay, The Role of Corporate Integrity Agreements in the Expansion of Fiduciary Duties",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2013",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=2317580",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "50973e1e820aef47a4e7ffdbdcb513d03f1845643fcf4fa5910e9528a0b7dac2"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2317580-001"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Who Is Accountable? When AI Makes the Wrong Decision? Rethinking Corporate Governance",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.19085/sijbpg130201"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7401",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7401.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:fb0841f5b611372759d4",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.4097,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: corporate, governance, one, produces, doctrine. Scope: traditional judicially developed fiduciary duty doctrine.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.19085/sijbpg130201",
  "queryId": "concept:b5ce5d92d4b5",
  "queryText": "AI agent governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.19085/sijbpg130201",
  "doi": "10.19085/sijbpg130201",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.19085/sijbpg130201",
   "Crossref": "10.19085/sijbpg130201"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T20:34:03.531Z",
  "providerPage": 10,
  "rawObservationSha256": "883bb25aabc41eecdd6592a96029f41db5212fb5dcd5382e8e9561bd08b770f9",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "95f3c3e1638ca36a1683b7a07036b5ed8191ad7a1549b24a5ebff941a468f5ce",
  "inputLine": 2295,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00010",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.19085/sijbpg130201",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Ibrahim Abdullahi"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2026-07-14",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.19085/sijbpg130201",
   "crossref:10.19085/sijbpg130201",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.19085/sijbpg130201",
   "title:8e7fcdb53e4a9fa9e91585ba",
   "proposition:3b79bfde1b95788ecfbe3e4c04b19bfe18a0bf1f1b81a9c9658063b95edc90d3"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "When one of these systems produces a harmful, discriminatory, or commercially damaging outcome, existing governance doctrine struggles to identify who answers for it.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "4a35dde39fd239725e423600876470228430c3dc15e46ec5d791ca81d9abbb31",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 2,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2317580-001",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2317580-001",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.4097,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: corporate, governance, one, produces, doctrine. Scope: traditional judicially developed fiduciary duty doctrine.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3981021-017",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3981021-017",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3479,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: corporate, governance, existing, identify. Scope: DAO charities with open forums and grant based onboarding.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:1558614-018",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1558614-018",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3421,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: makes, decision, corporate, governance. Scope: corporations large enough to trigger employee representation on the supervisory board; employee representatives may also carry union political objectives.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3373393-012",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3373393-012",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.3421,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: makes, decision, corporate, governance. Scope: boards where the CEO is dominant.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3411897-005",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3411897-005",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.34,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: accountable, corporate, governance. Scope: pre and post internet era corporate reorganization; no new technological innovation required.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0008, SHA-256 469be3af77a43b8a86f52c2e8253882abdefc7a0da53c392329c3cb8a11e8160, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "8054451a69ef32acad8547387ce1747d912e05aff545229682289c9924b7e805"
}