{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7413",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-7413",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Streaming Experience Over Compliance Why Frequent Use Not Governance Builds Manage E97967B08D",
 "text": "Experience Over Compliance: Why Frequent Use -Not Governance -Builds Managerial Trust in Generative AI presents the following source proposition: That question became the foundation of this doctoral research, which sought to bring empirical rigour to a gap the author encountered not in the literature, but in practice. This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that Form PF's counterparty disclosure proved far less burdensome in practice than anticipated: 93.75 percent of respondents encountered no difficulty identifying counterparties for the counterparty credit exposure questions. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "extension",
 "keywords": [
  "private-funds",
  "empirical-evidence",
  "compliance",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature",
  "crossref"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.",
  "Primary mapping confidence: 0.3703.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Experience Over Compliance: Why Frequent Use -Not Governance -Builds Managerial Trust in Generative AI",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6879502"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:2447306-033",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2447306-033",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Private Fund Disclosures Under the Dodd-Frank Act (2014). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2447306",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Private Fund Disclosures Under the Dodd-Frank Act",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2014",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=2447306",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "0c950d73240845e78faf1c3ca0ab820fcc50556faf7ff07f7f773d0876f0be8a"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2447306-033"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Experience Over Compliance: Why Frequent Use -Not Governance -Builds Managerial Trust in Generative AI",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6879502"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0009",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7413",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-7413.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:1e07a52ad67d5b94b908",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "moderate-confidence claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.3703,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: compliance, not, empirical, encountered, practice. Scope: responses to survey Question 16b; predominantly smaller, annually filing advisers.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "crossref",
  "sourceRecordId": "10.2139/ssrn.6879502",
  "queryId": "concept:b5ce5d92d4b5",
  "queryText": "AI agent governance",
  "canonicalUrl": "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6879502",
  "doi": "10.2139/ssrn.6879502",
  "externalIds": {
   "DOI": "10.2139/ssrn.6879502",
   "Crossref": "10.2139/ssrn.6879502"
  },
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T20:34:03.531Z",
  "providerPage": 10,
  "rawObservationSha256": "24f684ab5c7d6f522185afc840c4a3d1a1d0349009f29b1667b7ef947be5b65c",
  "inputSnapshotSha256": "95f3c3e1638ca36a1683b7a07036b5ed8191ad7a1549b24a5ebff941a468f5ce",
  "inputLine": 2490,
  "chunkId": "crossref-00001",
  "workId": "work:doi:10.2139/ssrn.6879502",
  "workAuthors": [
   "Cheryl Cheng Xin Yi"
  ],
  "workPublishedAt": "2026-01-01",
  "identityKeys": [
   "doi:10.2139/ssrn.6879502",
   "crossref:10.2139/ssrn.6879502",
   "url:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6879502",
   "title:41fbe6b19837057c75fc9950",
   "proposition:44b0bfa68690f7eedec28a46ff1a4644de39e48504c0db3abe52db4239dbc3e6"
  ],
  "sourceProposition": "That question became the foundation of this doctoral research, which sought to bring empirical rigour to a gap the author encountered not in the literature, but in practice.",
  "sourcePropositionSha256": "6c59df2b85e94b987fc6d559c653c76c947cbba5c1c34c28f9e0381fea5142c6",
  "sourcePropositionIndex": 1,
  "claimMappings": [
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2447306-033",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2447306-033",
    "rank": 1,
    "confidence": 0.3703,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: compliance, not, empirical, encountered, practice. Scope: responses to survey Question 16b; predominantly smaller, annually filing advisers.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3373393-001",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3373393-001",
    "rank": 2,
    "confidence": 0.3272,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: over, compliance, governance, builds. Scope: over a multi-decade time horizon; requires the supporting infrastructure components to be built.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:5225296-033",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5225296-033",
    "rank": 3,
    "confidence": 0.3271,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: over, compliance, governance, empirical, but. Scope: reputation must be openly auditable.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:3017612-006",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3017612-006",
    "rank": 4,
    "confidence": 0.324,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: over, compliance, not, governance, trust. Scope: agreements other than voting trusts.",
    "ambiguous": true
   },
   {
    "claimId": "kaal:claim:2811718-040",
    "claimUrl": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2811718-040",
    "rank": 5,
    "confidence": 0.3165,
    "method": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
    "whyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: over, compliance, not, became. Scope: SEC enforcement posture as of 2016.",
    "ambiguous": true
   }
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0009, SHA-256 b79e655db33b69d4e6de8a205792c1e02d068eea4880d69cd6faeb884041abdf, as written and authorize publication of all 250 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, provenance, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "fa6a830bca20fd5cb849c5ec720cc09547e84ff4564f86cdbba82ffa7a8a7ec2"
}