# kaal:position:2026-07-31-7418

**Affirmed position.** University Governance for Responsible AI presents the following source proposition: What uses of AI constitute violations of academic integrity? This proposition is pertinent to Kaal's source-bound claim that The decades long academic debate over improving fiduciary duty doctrine has overlooked Corporate Integrity Agreements entirely, even though the debate is otherwise framed as a choice between expanding and curtailing the doctrine. The proposed response is an extension: the relationship should remain limited to the retrieved source proposition and the mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.

**Status.** affirmed  **Published.** 2026-07-31

**Holds when.**

- The response is limited to the retrieved source proposition and mapped Kaal claim unless fuller source review supports a broader conclusion.
- External evidence level: abstract indexed.
- Mapping review tier: moderate-confidence claim review.
- Primary mapping confidence: 0.3861.
- The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation.

**Current debate.** University Governance for Responsible AI: https://doi.org/10.21900/j.alise.2024.1706

**Extends.** kaal:claim:2317580-003: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2317580-003

**Scholarly basis.** Wulf A. Kaal, Elizabeth R. Malay, The Role of Corporate Integrity Agreements in the Expansion of Fiduciary Duties (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2317580

**Source PDF sha256.** `50973e1e820aef47a4e7ffdbdcb513d03f1845643fcf4fa5910e9528a0b7dac2`

**Evidence level.** abstract indexed

**Mapping review tier.** moderate-confidence claim review

**Mapping confidence.** 0.3861  **Mapping ambiguous.** true

**Topics.** compliance, corporate-governance, historical-response, scholarly-literature, crossref

**Provenance.** Affirmed in kaal-review:2026-07-31:streaming-etl-0009 at https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review.

**Record type.** This is a dated commentary position that extends a scholarly corpus claim. It is not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the position.